By the way, we attended the single Umno entertainment in PJ behind in 2008 as good as the single Umno member stood up to introduce which Umno creates assent with Anwar Ibrahim. Almost the complete gymnasium booed him. The 'security guards' afterwards grabbed this guy by the neck, dragged him outside, as good as kicked the daylights out of him. He was knocked about up great as good as proper.
THE CORRIDORS OF POWER
Raja Petra Kamarudin
Let's not be carried divided usually since the small different immature politicians wanted to be recognized as possibilities for the entrance ubiquitous elections got romantic as good as raised the small issues, which will need the capitulation of the three member parties in Pakatan Rakyat.
PAS was an different celebration using the behind state as good as usually with the help of DAP as good as PKR is sitting in the in front of which they should be beholden for. They have the usual personality in Anwar who has left by trials as good as tribulations which no alternative personality has been through. He may not be undiluted though the subject is who is?
He has hold this bloc together which it has turn the formidable force which has woken up the domestic minds of the public. Today, it is where it is since of this the single leader. So unexpected there have been the small ungrateful immature politicians who have not finished any sacrifices lift issues, which in the initial place should not have been raised during all.
Are they for real or Trojan horses put to create the difference within the coalition. We have the long approach to go put this nation during turn as good as there is many work to be finished rather than create the division during this crucial stage. We should be deliberating ways to urge the quality, f! inancial , educational aspects of the average Malaysian life. Comment posted by 'bobby brown'
**************************************
That was the criticism by the reader starting by the name of 'bobby brown' posted inMalaysia Today. we have usually slightly edited the bad grammar though alternative than which no changes have been finished to which criticism -- alternative than the editing of the grammatical mistakes.
That is the single e.g. of many identical comments finished over the last few days. Even Oon Yeoh pronounced inThe Suntoday, "The answer utterly simply, is which PAS has the bent to turn as good big for the britches. It exhibited such behaviour after the 1999 General Election, where it did utterly well, as good as right away it's exhibiting such tendencies again."
Before we criticism upon which issue, however, we would similar to to touch upon the following headlines report:Kota Alam Shah representative M. Manoharan's call to fellow DAP representative Ronnie Liu (DAP-Pandamaran) to renounce if he failed to address the common ownership plan in Batu Caves shows all is not good in Selangor DAP.
we am essentially utterly surprised which Manoharan wants Ronnie Liu's head. we suspicion Pakatan Rakyat pronounced which Barisan Nasional was the the single who authorized which housing plan in Batu Caves. Is Manoharan observant which it was not Barisan Nasional though Pakatan Rakyat which is the law-breaker -- as good as Ronnie Liu in particular?
This would meant Manoharan is contradicting what his celebration pronounced as good as we was finished to assimilate which DAP does not concede the leaders to contradict their own celebration -- as the Tunku Aziz Tunku Ibrahim part has proven. So who authorized the Batu Caves project? Barisan Nasional or Pakatan Rakyat? And if it was Barisan Nasional afterwards since contingency Ronnie Liu resign?
we recollect relating the! story t he integrate of years ago about Ronnie Liu, 'Bangsar' Bala, my mother Marina, I, as good as the fifth person, starting to Manoharan's residence to encounter his mother when he was in Kamunting underneath ISA detention. The purpose of which revisit was to ask Manoharan's mother to send the message to the five Hindraf ISA detainees which we wish them to contest the Mar 2008 ubiquitous election.
We referred to which they contest parliament seats since the Indian equates to is the national issue as good as it would be improved which the problems facing the Indians be raised in Parliament. Ronnie even indicated which he was rebuilt to 'vacate' his chair if Manoharan or any of the alternative 4 Hindraf detainees wanted which seat.
In alternative words, Ronnie was rebuilt to give approach to Manoharan if need be. Not many politicians would be rebuilt to scapegoat their own domestic career for the good of someone else. Ronnie, however, was rebuilt to do which as good as which is since we am his loyal friend. He has shown which he is not in governing body for personal gain as good as is rebuilt to scapegoat himself for the consequence of the party.
Anyway, behind to the posting by 'bobby brown'. "We should be deliberating ways to urge the quality, financial, educational aspects of the average Malaysian life," pronounced 'bobby brown'. we suppose what he equates to by which matter is we should be focusing upon how to have Malaysia the improved country.
And we would determine with that. However, we contingency initial come to an agreement upon the definition of 'better'. 'Better' can meant different things to different people.
For example, the organisation which was 'in the red' last year to the tune of RM250 million can be pronounced to have finished improved this year when it reduces these loses to usually RM150 million. Next year it does even improved when the losses get marked down to usually RM80 million. By the fifth year it does even impro! ved (the many appropriate opening in five years) when it breaks even, although it still does not have any money.
So what does 'better' mean? And how would we interpret which to the improved Malaysia?
Does 'better' meant there have been still obvious as good as prevalent crime as good as abuse of energy though not as bad as before? Does 'better' meant there have been still obvious as good as prevalent racism, discrimination as good as domestic harm though not as bad as before? Does 'better' meant usually 5,000 Malaysians died in traffic accidents this year compared to 6,000 Malaysians the year before? Does 'better' meant right away usually 100 people die in police custody compared to 180 people in the past?
Let me put it an additional way: does 'better' meant right away your associate commits illicit love affair usually once the month compared to every week prior to this? Why should we endure your associate committing illicit love affair even once the year? How can we cruise your associate committing illicit love affair once the month as 'better' than once the week?
What is 'better' for we may not be 'better' for me. If all we meant by 'better' is the grade of transgressions, as good as we have been rebuilt to accept lesser incidences over incomparable incidences as 'better', afterwards we clearly do not share the same ideals. Would someone who murdered usually the single chairman be improved than someone who murdered ten people? Would not even the single murder have which chairman the murderer? There is no such thing as the 'worse' killer as good as the 'better' murderer. Either approach we still hang.
And herein lies the problem. You have been seeking during how bad Barisan Nasional or Umno have been as good as anything lesser than which we have been rebuilt to concede as good as accept.
We all talk about change. We all aspire for change. We all quarrel for change. But we have been yet to determine upon which definition of chang! e. And t his is since we have been regularly in disagreement. While we determine which shift is required, we cannot determine upon what is meant by 'change'.
This subsequent divide is aimed during usually Muslims so non-Muslims can jump over this divide if they wish to.
Let's contend which the Muslim never prays or fasts as good as lives the hold up of impiety which includes drinking, gambling as good as adultery. Then, the single day, this Muslim starts praying once in the whilst upon Fridays as good as fasts the integrate of days the year during the month of Ramadhan. However, this chairman still drinks, gambles as good as indulges in adultery. Does this have which chairman the 'better ' Muslim or is which chairman still the bad Muslim?
we know the answer to which so no need to reply to my question. In short, there is no such thing as the improved Muslim. There have been no degrees of Muslims. A Muslim is someone who abides to as good as follows the manners laid down in Islam. You usually cannot be the small bit pregnant.
So what is my understand of the improved Malaysia? My understand of the improved Malaysia is the multitude which can endure dissenting or opposing views. And which is my main beef with Barisan Nasional as good as Umno.
No, my main beef with Barisan Nasional as good as Umno is not the arrogance, racism, persecution, abuse of power, corruption, violation of elemental liberties as good as polite rights, etc., which they continue Those, to me, have been merely the symptoms of an additional disease. Those have been not the causes of the disease. Those have been signs which there is the disease.
And this 'disease' is we do not have leisure of thought, leisure of choice, leisure of opinion, leisure of expression, leisure of information, leisure of the press, leisure of association, as good as so on. And since of all these lacks of freedoms, we end up with prevalent as good as obvious arrogance, racism, persecution, ab! use of p ower, corruption, violation of elemental liberties as good as polite rights, etc.
And this is what many of we do not understand. You demeanour during the symptoms of the mildew as good as we try to cure the symptoms. we demeanour during the equates to of the mildew as good as attack the equates to of which disease. And if we can discharge the equates to afterwards the symptoms will automatically disappear.
we have written about this subsequent point prior to though concede me to repeat what we said.
200 years ago, Napoleon Bonaparte pounded the 'disease' which was plaguing Europe. Around 35 years after that, multitude began to change. Then, roughly an additional 35 years later, the total of Europe changed as good as what we see today in Europe is the outcome of which change.
So Napoleon did not try to cure the symptoms of the disease. He pounded the equates to of which disease. In time, changes happened as good as the symptoms of the mildew disappeared.
we know we am repeating what we have written many times before. But how do we not keep repeating myself when after observant it so many times we still do not get it?
Even people similar to Haris Ibrahim (Sam) cannot assimilate what we am saying. And he is the lawyer, too, mind you. Yet even he cannot assimilate what we am perplexing to say. He, too, similar to many of you, go by the adage which the steep swims, we swim, so we contingency be the duck. You do not await ABU. So, if we do not await ABU, afterwards we contingency be supporting Umno.
In the initial place, did we ever contend we do not await ABU? What we did contend is which usually shouting ABU is not enough. It has to be some-more than usually that. Kicking out Umno will do no bloody great if the complaint is not Umno though the culture which multiply organisations similar to Umno. We can get rid of Umno though which will not get rid of the problem. And the complaint is the approach we think as go! od as do things.
Let me go behind to what 'bobby brown' as good as Oon Yeoh commented. One delegate during the PAS ubiquitous public last week pronounced which he felt Tok Guru Abdul Hadi Awang should turn the budding apportion if Pakatan Rakyat gets to form the subsequent sovereign government. And afterwards all hell broke loose.
This was the perspective of usually ONE delegate from amongst some-more than the single million PAS members. One man from ONE MILLION pronounced this as good as the celebration DID NOT adopt which offer as the single of the Resolutions. In alternative words, PAS authorised which delegate to verbalise though they did not adopt what he said.
And in annoy of which everyone whacks the total celebration as if the celebration had committed the cardinal sin. Are we observant which the celebration should not have authorised him to speak? Are we observant which they should have switched off the microphone as good as shout during him to sit down? Are we observant which they should do what MIC does -- get the confidence guards to draw towards him outward as good as flog him up?
By the way, we attended the single Umno entertainment in PJ behind in 2008 as good as the single Umno member stood up to introduce which Umno creates assent with Anwar Ibrahim. Almost the complete gymnasium booed him. The 'security guards' afterwards grabbed this guy by the neck, dragged him outside, as good as kicked the daylights out of him. He was knocked about up great as good as proper.
And which is since we don't wish Umno. They do not apply oneself leisure of suspicion as good as leisure of opinion/expression. But afterwards we wish PAS to do the same thing. So what ABU have been we articulate about when we wish to be usually similar to Umno?
We have to be improved than that. If we have been starting to be usually similar to Umno afterwards since would the electorate wish to flog Umno out? We have to have it clear which we will not c! oncede u pon violations of our leisure of thought, leisure of choice, leisure of opinion, leisure of expression, leisure of information, leisure of the press, leisure of association, as good as so on.
Currently, we find which many, if not most, of the opposition leaders as good as supporters do not apply oneself leisure of thought, leisure of choice, leisure of opinion, leisure of expression, leisure of information, leisure of the press, leisure of association, as good as so on.
And this is my beef with the ABU-screamers. My understand of ABU is CHANGE. Your understand of ABU is Anwar Ibrahim as good as usually Anwar Ibrahim contingency turn the budding minister. Even the 'liberal' Oon Yeoh thinks similar to this. Even the 'liberal' Oon Yeoh does not endure leisure of thought, leisure of choice, leisure of opinion, leisure of expression, leisure of information, leisure of the press, leisure of association, as good as so on.
So, yes, we await ABU. But my ABU ispolitik baru, budaya baru, Malaysia baru, Melayu baru, etc. Your ABU is old wine in the new bottle. So we can quarrel for your ABU your approach as good as we will quarrel for my ABU my way. You can walk if we want. we will swim. But we have been both starting the same direction. And usually since the steep additionally swims does not have me the steep -- usually similar to usually since the monkey additionally walks does not have we the monkey. Or does it?
By the way, 'bobby brown', PAS is the second largest celebration in Malaysia in conditions of membership. There have been some-more PAS members than DAP as good as PKR members combined. Pakatan Rakyat needs PAS some-more than PAS needs Pakatan Rakyat. So stop being pompous as good as condescending.
"PAS was an different celebration using the behind state as good as usually with the help of DAP as good as PKR is sitting in the in front of which they should be beholden for,"konon. You sound usually similar to Umno. This ! is how U mno normally talks. So what ABU have been we articulate about when we ape Umno in all which it does as good as say?
East Coast Malays will call thisgong telajak. Go find out what this equates to from your Malay friends, if we occur to have any.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment