Businessperson Deepak Jaikishan regretted his impasse in removing in isolation questioner P Balasubramaniam to make a second statutory declaration (SD), which topsy-turvy an progressing a single linking Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak to murdered Mongolian national Altantuya Shaariibuu.
In an talk withMalaysiakinilast night, Deepak(left)said he had usually become concerned during a request of a "female friend" compared with a parties who would be influenced by a fallout of a initial statutory declaration.
"I was asked to assistance by a friend, you agreed to assistance her since you could see a repercussions will affect their complete group. It was to me - removing concerned in this whole Bala failure - a mistake," he said.
"I had no commercial operation being there, you am a businessman. you bewail helping a crony whom you suspicion was true... you am not ostensible to be concerned in this James Bond movie."
Deepak declined to elaborate upon a identity of a womanlike friend.
In an talk withMalaysiakinilast night, Deepak(left)said he had usually become concerned during a request of a "female friend" compared with a parties who would be influenced by a fallout of a initial statutory declaration."I was asked to assistance by a friend, you agreed to assistance her since you could see a repercussions will affect their complete group. It was to me - removing concerned in this whole Bala failure - a mistake," he said.
"I had no commercial operation being there, you am a businessman. you bewail helping a crony whom you suspicion was true... you am not ostensible to be concerned in this James Bond movie."
Deepak declined to elaborate upon a identity of a womanlike friend.
He is, however, known to be closely linked to a premier's wife Rosmah Mansor, whom he pronounced was like an"older sister"to him. Asked to elaborate upon his regrets, after a prolonged pause, Deepak replied: "Would you not bewail removing concerned in something so murky, which involves mu! rder, wh ich involves so many things which are so negative, would you not bewail it? Anybody would bewail it."
The carpet businessman pronounced a failure had combined a "negative aura" for him as a businessperson.
Balasubramaniam, who hadgone publicwith a initial SD upon Jul 3, 2008 had abruptly withdrawn it during an additional press discussion a following day.
Accompanied by counsel M Arulampalam which day, Balasubramaniam had produceda second SD, claiming which he had finished a initial a single underneath compulsion as well as fled a country a subsequent day.
Balasubramaniam (left in photo) re-emerged upon Nov 12, 2009 in a form of a five-partYouTubevideo interview- believed to be shot in India - retracting his second SD as well as claiming which he had usually finished it after being offering RM5 million by Deepak.
Deepak, who usually addressed a controversy upon April 6, 2011 after whistleblower Raja Petra Kamarudin regenerated a matter, discharged his links to Balasubramaniam as a small clubbing mate.
The carpet businessman pronounced a failure had combined a "negative aura" for him as a businessperson.
Balasubramaniam, who hadgone publicwith a initial SD upon Jul 3, 2008 had abruptly withdrawn it during an additional press discussion a following day.
Accompanied by counsel M Arulampalam which day, Balasubramaniam had produceda second SD, claiming which he had finished a initial a single underneath compulsion as well as fled a country a subsequent day.
Balasubramaniam (left in photo) re-emerged upon Nov 12, 2009 in a form of a five-partYouTubevideo interview- believed to be shot in India - retracting his second SD as well as claiming which he had usually finished it after being offering RM5 million by Deepak.Deepak, who usually addressed a controversy upon April 6, 2011 after whistleblower Raja Petra Kamarudin regenerated a matter, discharged his links to Balasubramaniam as a small clubbing mate.
'I brought everyone together for SD 2.0'
However, in a talk yesterday, Deepak pronounced there was a "tinge of truth" to what a in isolation eye had been claiming in a SD saga.
Explaining his role, Deepak pronounced he was responsible for facilitating a meeting in between Balasubramaniam as well as a celebration which was concerned by a initial SD.
"It was damage carry out to stop a problem... you was tasked - don'! t ask wh o tasked me - with removing him to determine to pointer an additional SD, not since of a (first) SD itself though since of a repercussions which will occur a subsequent day if which (first) SD was not reversed," he said.
"For today, let's just put it this way, you assisted, you did not breeze (the second SD)... it was not (drafted by) a same counsel which appeared (at a press conference) a subsequent day, it was (by) a utterly opposite lawyer.
"We assisted in removing everybody together though a initial counsel was not mine, it was sent by a people who were in a group (implicated in a initial SD) which you merely put in a same room," he said.
Asked if a RM5 million inducement Balasubramaniam claimed he was offering for you do a second SD was true, Deepak replied: "Knowing Bala, he would not have finished it for nothing."
However, when pulpy if a income came from him or from a parties concerned by a initial SD, Deepak declined to elaborate, saying which this might be revealed in destiny interviews.
In Jul this year, Balasubramaniam, who briefly re-emerged in Kuala Lumpur, had toldMalaysiakinithat Deepak had attempted to bribe hima second time, this time with RM200,000 as well as an apartment during Times Square (right), for a in isolation eye to produce a video recording implicating opposition figures for creation him redress his second SD.
For this, Balasubramaniam claimed which an intermediary by a name of Suresh had banked in RM100,000 in advance in to a comment of a former's wife, though he later had a income eliminated to his lawyer, asking which it be returned to Deepak.
'No a single returned any income to me'!
Responding to this, Deepak said: "I review about this in a papers, about him wanting to lapse income to me, though you never got any income from him or his counsel - that's a truth.
However, in a talk yesterday, Deepak pronounced there was a "tinge of truth" to what a in isolation eye had been claiming in a SD saga.
Explaining his role, Deepak pronounced he was responsible for facilitating a meeting in between Balasubramaniam as well as a celebration which was concerned by a initial SD.
"It was damage carry out to stop a problem... you was tasked - don'! t ask wh o tasked me - with removing him to determine to pointer an additional SD, not since of a (first) SD itself though since of a repercussions which will occur a subsequent day if which (first) SD was not reversed," he said.
"For today, let's just put it this way, you assisted, you did not breeze (the second SD)... it was not (drafted by) a same counsel which appeared (at a press conference) a subsequent day, it was (by) a utterly opposite lawyer.
"We assisted in removing everybody together though a initial counsel was not mine, it was sent by a people who were in a group (implicated in a initial SD) which you merely put in a same room," he said.
Asked if a RM5 million inducement Balasubramaniam claimed he was offering for you do a second SD was true, Deepak replied: "Knowing Bala, he would not have finished it for nothing."
However, when pulpy if a income came from him or from a parties concerned by a initial SD, Deepak declined to elaborate, saying which this might be revealed in destiny interviews.
In Jul this year, Balasubramaniam, who briefly re-emerged in Kuala Lumpur, had toldMalaysiakinithat Deepak had attempted to bribe hima second time, this time with RM200,000 as well as an apartment during Times Square (right), for a in isolation eye to produce a video recording implicating opposition figures for creation him redress his second SD.For this, Balasubramaniam claimed which an intermediary by a name of Suresh had banked in RM100,000 in advance in to a comment of a former's wife, though he later had a income eliminated to his lawyer, asking which it be returned to Deepak.
'No a single returned any income to me'!
Responding to this, Deepak said: "I review about this in a papers, about him wanting to lapse income to me, though you never got any income from him or his counsel - that's a truth.
"I don't know where this RM100,000 scenario came in to play, since out of a blue he came as well as mentioned about this RM100,000 he longed for to lapse to me.
"Of course, if he has taken income from me as well as he wants to lapse (it to me), very goodlah."
Deepak refused to respond serve to repeated questions upon Balasubramaniam's second turn of allegations, saying which he might do so an additional time.
"I also wish to get a Bala matter off my chest. you consider as a businessman, you don't wish this cloud unresolved over my conduct as well as it is best which it is resolved during a right time, (but) not tonight," he said.
Asked if he has decided to go open upon this since of a particular commercial operation brawl over land with a powers-that-be, he replied: "Nothing... We have finished other bigger building exchange through a same group as well as a same people."
However, asked if a "same people" meant Najib, Deepak nodded silently, as well as when queried for details, he replied: "Not today".
"Of course, if he has taken income from me as well as he wants to lapse (it to me), very goodlah."
Deepak refused to respond serve to repeated questions upon Balasubramaniam's second turn of allegations, saying which he might do so an additional time."I also wish to get a Bala matter off my chest. you consider as a businessman, you don't wish this cloud unresolved over my conduct as well as it is best which it is resolved during a right time, (but) not tonight," he said.
Asked if he has decided to go open upon this since of a particular commercial operation brawl over land with a powers-that-be, he replied: "Nothing... We have finished other bigger building exchange through a same group as well as a same people."
However, asked if a "same people" meant Najib, Deepak nodded silently, as well as when queried for details, he replied: "Not today".
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Polit! ically I ncorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment