VOXPOP'Poor Najib is in a pocket of ultra worried forces. He needs to soften these forces to hang upon to a power.'
PM says 114A 'modern, forward-looking' legislation
Kgen:How can territory 114A of a Evidence Act prevent slander as well as cyber-bullying when a perpetrators can censor at a back of an trusting temperament knowing which a military will usually go after whoever is decorated as a author?They know which a military will be as well quiescent to investigate since they have a processed victim who contingency infer his innocence, which is roughly impossible.
Swipenter:Innocent unless proven guilty or guilty unless proven trusting - which do you prefer? This is aimed at determining as well as not facilitating a scold as well as responsible make use of of a Internet.
I rather cite you giveaway a guilty chairman due to miss of explanation as well as justification than to convict an trusting chairman but explanation as well as evidence. This is gross injustice of a misfortune kind. How brazen looking can which be?
iBoleh:Najib is making a same inapplicable designation to urge a decision not to review territory 114A, similar to what he did when his deputy claimed he is Malay first, Malaysian second.
His deputy went opposite what he had tweeted when he was divided overseas. His care as well as authority will be in danger if he doesn't put! his foo t down.
Mushiro:Why did Najib indoctrinate a cupboard to discuss a 114A in a wake of criticisms? But a cupboard which was chaired by DPM Muhyiddin Yassin motionless not to review it. Did Najib get a message?
Vgeorgemy:Poor Najib is in a pocket of ultra worried forces. He needs to soften these forces to hang upon to a power.
Bender:Care to discuss upon which 'forward looking' claim, Najib? Because I don't see how such blunde! r which yo! u call 'legislation' can be described as brazen looking.
Oh, right, discuss is not a culture. So, part of brazen looking is to accept whatever people like you say but question.
Anomnim:We have been not arguing which you don't need which law, you have been arguing which since a weight of explanation right away falls upon a people who could not authority a resources required to come up with a justification to clear themselves.
Can you imagine a rape victim having to explanation which a rapist is a culprit?
Cantabrigian:What nonsense is this? No matter how modern as well as brazen looking you are, a element of law is still a same over a past 20 centuries - which a chairman is trusting unless proven guilty.
Puchong Mali:It is indeed 'forward looking' for Third World politicians who still dream of land upon to energy in this age of Internet. - Malaysiakini Read More @ Source
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus | !
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment