Mat Zain: Only a tribunal can remove attorney-general



Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission's emissary arch commissioner Mohd Shukri Abdull's statement that a MACC once shaped a row to examine a attorney-general has brought scorn as well as disregard upon him.

Former Kuala Lumpur CID arch Mat Zain Ibrahim questioned a MACC's energy to designate a row to examine allegations done opposite a attorney-general Abdul Gani Patail.

NONEMat Zain toldMalaysiakinitoday he was taken by surpise by Shukri's reply yesterday.

Asked either a swindle physique could take movement movement opposite a sitting AG, Shukri (left) had pronounced a MACC had had onceformed a three-member panelto examine a AG over Anwar Ibrahim's black eye-incident.

Mat Zain pronounced a Attorney-General's Chambers itself had no right or energy to designate such a panel, especially where a sitting AG was concerned.

"The usually chairman who can designate a row called a 'tribunal' to adjudicate a control of an AG is a Yang di-Pertuan Agong, as settled underneath Article 125 (3) of a Federal Constitution as well as read together with Article 145(6). And this must usually be upon a advice of a budding minister," Mat Zain said.

"If right away a MACC says it has allocated a row to adjudicate a AG's conduct, afterwards it must be very daring enough to adopt a Agong's powers as well as rights. How could t! shawl be?

NONE"It is ridiculous. The MACC has no energy to institute, control or pause a criminal proceeding opposite any chairman similar to a AG. How can it have a powers to designate a row to examine Gani?" he asked.

Mat Zain as well as former Commercial Crime Investigations Department executive Ramli Yusuff have been calling for a tribunal to examine a various allegations of corruption as well as abuse of energy done opposite Gani. Ramli's censure opposite a AG was upon theCopgateissue.

The former Kuala Lumpur CID arch was commenting upon MACC's examine in to a Ho Hup Construction Bhd affair Gani is pronounced to be related with.
MACC saidit is independentin a examine as well as that it could additionally designate a row to demeanour in to it.

In a Ho Hup case, Gani is pronounced to have favoured a company's former executive emissary chairperson Vincent Lye, who hails from Sabah, as well as in lapse is purported to have perceived RM18,000 for a renovation of a one-story dwelling in Seremban.

MACC's Shukri additionally pronounced a MACC Operations Review Panel headed by former auditor-general Hadenan Abdul Jalil was "independent as well as unrelenting in its views" as well as had in a past called for a reopening of cases that had been closed, leading to a little persons accused being prosecuted.

Can Operations Review Panel overrule AG?

Mat Zain pronounced he does not subject a integrity or a ability of a review row members.

"The subject is not either they have been thorough as well as unrelenting or not. The subject is either they have been empowered to make a preference to overrule a AG, or for that make a difference a MACC. They don't have a energy to overrule a AG, either underneath a MACC law or any alternative law," he said.
Shukr i had admitted that in a end, a commentary of any review would have to be sent to a attorney-general or a emissary open prosecutor for action.

NONEThe former managing executive o! f construction hulk Ho Hup, Low Tuck Choy, pronounced last Saturday a MACC was usually meddlesome in uncoveringwho had leaked documentsthat implicated Gani in allegations of abuse of energy as well as graft.

Low had pronounced that a papers containing an check from an electrical company, that carried out renovation functions upon a Seremban bungalow, a remuneration document with Gani's name upon it as well as a coupon were genuine papers as well as he as well as a company knew who had signed a cheque.
MACC wants some-more evidence

MACC asked Low, who has lodged apolice reportover a lack of progress in a examine following Deputy Minister in a Prime Minister's Department VK Liew's response, to come forward if he had some-more vidence to help in a probe.
Mat Zain is additionally striving to transparent his name in Anwar Ibrahim's inform upon phony of justification in the"black-eye probe" filed opposite Gani, former inspector-general of military Musa Hassan as well as Hospital Kuala Lumpur alloy Dr Abdul Rahman Yusof as well as Mat Zain himself.

Mat Zain pronounced a investigations in to Anwar's censure were carried underneath Section fifteen of Anti-Corruption Act 1997, that concerns a use of one's office for gratification.

He pronounced a ACA Act used by a MACC had no bearing or aptitude during all to an corruption underneath Section 192 of a Penal Code, that is upon a phony of evidence.

"The ! ingredie nts to be proven underneath Section 192 of a Penal Code for a phony of justification have been different from that of Section fifteen of a ACA Act. This in itself shows a MACC obviously dreaming a issue of Anwar's censure upon phony of justification in his black-eye case.

"Investigating Anwar's inform underneath Section fifteen equates to that a MACC did not actually examine a phony of justification as reported," he said.

A three-member row headed by former Federal Court decider Abdul Kadir SulaimanclearedGani as well as Musa of any indiscretion in a infancy decision.

Musa, who was a investigating officer in a Sodomy we box opposite Anwar, had in an disdainful interview with Malaysiakiniadmittedthat he took Anwar's blood representation during a black-eye incident.
Read More @ Source



More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: