According to the Bukit Gelugor MP as well as DAP National Chairman, Karpal Singh, inaugurated MPs or state assemblymen (ADUNs) cannout go opposite the wishes of the people. We support the mount made by Karpal as well as you goal which the alternative leaders of DAP as well as the alternative two Pakatan member parties, PKR as well as PAS would additionally state their mount opposite party-hopping.
It is not usually happening from the Pakatan side (who switched stay as well as assimilated BN), though it is additionally happening at the BN side (switching their support to Pakatan). And all these situation has the reasons behind. But you do not caring either it is because they were being paid for over (with money) or it is because of their "principle" which they have been believing in.
What you all knew is which these MPs as well as state assemblymen were inaugurated by the people in the ubiquitous elections who voted as well as supported the domestic parties of their preference as well as not by the individual persons named. And those MPs as well as state assemblymen were inaugurated upon their particular party's ticket as well as not upon their own or whatsoever means.
Therefore, to set things right, these MPs as well as ADUNs who give up their parties should therefore additionally renounce from their inaugurated seats in sequence to allow the re-election take place. This is to infer which if these MPs as well as ADUNs really have the support of the people based upon their individual situation or their domestic party affiliation.
In this case, there should be the LAW to be enforced opposite all party-hoppers to renounce from their inaugurated seats or constituencies if they were to decide to renounce from th! eir part ies or switching their domestic affiliation. In you do so, the law barring MPs who had quiescent from their seats from contesting in the subsequent ubiquitous elections contingency additionally be undone in sequence to pave way for the anti party-hopping law to be enforced. Otherwise, it would be conflicting. Currently, there have been no laws barring ADUNs who quiescent from their seats from contesting in the subsequent ubiquitous elections.
If the BN refuses to order the anti party-hopping la! w, can t he Pakatan Rakyat beginner it first? Why not? Do it at the state (where Pakatan in power) level first. Yeah, you all know which it is not which easy to turn the great guy though to be the bad guy, it is the lot faster than you expected. So, do you wish to say steadfastly with your principles?
It is not usually happening from the Pakatan side (who switched stay as well as assimilated BN), though it is additionally happening at the BN side (switching their support to Pakatan). And all these situation has the reasons behind. But you do not caring either it is because they were being paid for over (with money) or it is because of their "principle" which they have been believing in.
What you all knew is which these MPs as well as state assemblymen were inaugurated by the people in the ubiquitous elections who voted as well as supported the domestic parties of their preference as well as not by the individual persons named. And those MPs as well as state assemblymen were inaugurated upon their particular party's ticket as well as not upon their own or whatsoever means.
Therefore, to set things right, these MPs as well as ADUNs who give up their parties should therefore additionally renounce from their inaugurated seats in sequence to allow the re-election take place. This is to infer which if these MPs as well as ADUNs really have the support of the people based upon their individual situation or their domestic party affiliation.
In this case, there should be the LAW to be enforced opposite all party-hoppers to renounce from their inaugurated seats or constituencies if they were to decide to renounce from th! eir part ies or switching their domestic affiliation. In you do so, the law barring MPs who had quiescent from their seats from contesting in the subsequent ubiquitous elections contingency additionally be undone in sequence to pave way for the anti party-hopping law to be enforced. Otherwise, it would be conflicting. Currently, there have been no laws barring ADUNs who quiescent from their seats from contesting in the subsequent ubiquitous elections.
If the BN refuses to order the anti party-hopping la! w, can t he Pakatan Rakyat beginner it first? Why not? Do it at the state (where Pakatan in power) level first. Yeah, you all know which it is not which easy to turn the great guy though to be the bad guy, it is the lot faster than you expected. So, do you wish to say steadfastly with your principles?
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment