YOURSAY'Bafia is a legislation to carry out those in a promissory note industry from divulgence personal details, not for silencing those exposing a crime.'
Najib defends Bafia charge opposite Rafizi
Changeagent:PM Najib Razak is usually half right. While a insurance of a bona fide right to remoteness of bank clients is paramount to a success of a country's monetary system, a same insurance should not be afforded to crooks as well as bootleg income launderers.
Even Switzerland, a former protected breakwater for dictators as well as crime lords, is right away signatory to a OECD standards per a exchange of report upon request in taxation as well as laundering matters.
As a make a difference of fact, Swiss banks have been right away systematically refusing to accept deposits from politicians if they suspect which a supports have been of indeterminate origin.
Najib should re-state as well as clarify his own position upon either there is a need for Bafia to strengthen a remoteness of people who consistently rivet in crime as well as income laundering.
Loyal Malaysian:Save us a rhetoric, PM. A eminence contingency be finished either a disclosures have been for personal benefit or in this case in open interests - to uncover a abuse of open supports in a NFC (National Feedlot Corporation) scandal.
Lim Chong Leong:Bafia is a legislation to carry out those in a promissory note industry from divulgence personal details, not for silenci! ng those placed with a shortcoming of exposing a crime. Najib, you have been so finished this time, as well as usually by your own misdeeds.
Starr:What Najib is trying to urge a use of Bafia opposite a whistleblowers is positively foolish during best, rubbish during worse.
He is either for purify supervision or opposite it, there is no dual ways about it. What he did in PKR strategic director Rafizi Ramli's case is inexcusable, it shows he is not critical about transforming a government.
Anonymous #19098644:This is a most foolish make a difference there is. Bafia is there to strengthen a firmness of a promissory note system. It is there to safeguard which income launderers similar to a Shahrizat Abdul Jalil family do not abuse a promissory note complement to refine their unwashed monies.
Because a BNM (Bank Negara) has unsuccessful in a fiduciary purpose of ensuring which a complement is not used by hurtful crooks to transfer their monies, a whistleblower has to blow a whistle.
Brahman:I all agree with Najib with regards to Bafia ruling, however a MACC (Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission) should be eccentric as well as a investigation as well as prosecution of any alleged act of crime should be decided by Parliament as well as not a AG (attorney-general).
The present AG should be removed as well as replaced, usually afterwards a complement would have a glimmer of certitude in a eyes of a rakyat.
Since this has not been finished as well as a MACC as well as the! AG have been n! ot deemed to be impartial, afterwards a subsequent most appropriate proceed is a media. The movement of Rafizi as well as former Public Bank clerk Johari Mohamad is very commendable underneath these circumstances.
Quigonbond:Najib is right in terms of law because a Whistleblowers Protection Act negates insurance of whistleblowers if they do not impute a make a difference to relevant authorities. But that's ! a law.
The question is what's right? Those have been dual very apart issues. What's right is, if you were a most appropriate democracy in a world, it would not have mattered who a make a difference was brought to a attention of as prolonged as it was finished upon reasonable basis as well as in great faith.
And Najib should honestly ask himself because people no longer move complaints to a MACC. For each finger forked elsewhere, four have been indicating during him.
IloveBN:The Bafia Act should free exposes such during which of NFC. Otherwise it becomes a useless Act which protects hurtful practices.
Notifiying MACC about hurtful practices is useless. What has happened to a loads of reports opposite Sarawak Chief Minister Abdul Taib Mahmud?
Tholu:If a MACC had promptly acted upon NFC after a wrongdoings were exposed, afterwards maybe a open could have had a little toleration as well as acceptance of a authorities' movement upon Rafizi.
If MACC had non-stop a file upon a Ampang LRT extension scandal, afterwards maybe a open could have had a little toleration as well as acceptance of a authorities' movement upon Rafizi.
If MACC had acted upon a alleged crime concerned in th! e Scorpen! e purchase, afterwards maybe a open could have had a little toleration as well as acceptance of a authorities' movement upon Rafizi.
Whistleblowers will not have second thoughts in coming MACC or a police with any damning report as well as evidence opposite any company or entity, though alas...
Odin:In a democratic country run by politicians who may not be angels though have been distant improved than those in a BN, then, yes, Rafizi should have left to a MACC with a information.
But you have been articulate about a pseudo-democratic country run by politicians who have been not usually fascist as well as corrupt, though they also have supervision agencies such as a MACC serving their interest only.
! Rafizi h as had no choice though to make a report public.
Swipenter:Both Najib as well as MACC have been carrying credit issues. The open do not have enough certitude in them to carry out their responsibilities without fright as well as favour.
Najib defends Bafia charge opposite Rafizi
Changeagent:PM Najib Razak is usually half right. While a insurance of a bona fide right to remoteness of bank clients is paramount to a success of a country's monetary system, a same insurance should not be afforded to crooks as well as bootleg income launderers.Even Switzerland, a former protected breakwater for dictators as well as crime lords, is right away signatory to a OECD standards per a exchange of report upon request in taxation as well as laundering matters.
As a make a difference of fact, Swiss banks have been right away systematically refusing to accept deposits from politicians if they suspect which a supports have been of indeterminate origin.
Najib should re-state as well as clarify his own position upon either there is a need for Bafia to strengthen a remoteness of people who consistently rivet in crime as well as income laundering.
Loyal Malaysian:Save us a rhetoric, PM. A eminence contingency be finished either a disclosures have been for personal benefit or in this case in open interests - to uncover a abuse of open supports in a NFC (National Feedlot Corporation) scandal.
Lim Chong Leong:Bafia is a legislation to carry out those in a promissory note industry from divulgence personal details, not for silenci! ng those placed with a shortcoming of exposing a crime. Najib, you have been so finished this time, as well as usually by your own misdeeds.
Starr:What Najib is trying to urge a use of Bafia opposite a whistleblowers is positively foolish during best, rubbish during worse.
He is either for purify supervision or opposite it, there is no dual ways about it. What he did in PKR strategic director Rafizi Ramli's case is inexcusable, it shows he is not critical about transforming a government.
Anonymous #19098644:This is a most foolish make a difference there is. Bafia is there to strengthen a firmness of a promissory note system. It is there to safeguard which income launderers similar to a Shahrizat Abdul Jalil family do not abuse a promissory note complement to refine their unwashed monies.
Because a BNM (Bank Negara) has unsuccessful in a fiduciary purpose of ensuring which a complement is not used by hurtful crooks to transfer their monies, a whistleblower has to blow a whistle.
Brahman:I all agree with Najib with regards to Bafia ruling, however a MACC (Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission) should be eccentric as well as a investigation as well as prosecution of any alleged act of crime should be decided by Parliament as well as not a AG (attorney-general).
The present AG should be removed as well as replaced, usually afterwards a complement would have a glimmer of certitude in a eyes of a rakyat.
Since this has not been finished as well as a MACC as well as the! AG have been n! ot deemed to be impartial, afterwards a subsequent most appropriate proceed is a media. The movement of Rafizi as well as former Public Bank clerk Johari Mohamad is very commendable underneath these circumstances.
Quigonbond:Najib is right in terms of law because a Whistleblowers Protection Act negates insurance of whistleblowers if they do not impute a make a difference to relevant authorities. But that's ! a law.
The question is what's right? Those have been dual very apart issues. What's right is, if you were a most appropriate democracy in a world, it would not have mattered who a make a difference was brought to a attention of as prolonged as it was finished upon reasonable basis as well as in great faith.
And Najib should honestly ask himself because people no longer move complaints to a MACC. For each finger forked elsewhere, four have been indicating during him.
IloveBN:The Bafia Act should free exposes such during which of NFC. Otherwise it becomes a useless Act which protects hurtful practices.
Notifiying MACC about hurtful practices is useless. What has happened to a loads of reports opposite Sarawak Chief Minister Abdul Taib Mahmud?
Tholu:If a MACC had promptly acted upon NFC after a wrongdoings were exposed, afterwards maybe a open could have had a little toleration as well as acceptance of a authorities' movement upon Rafizi.
If MACC had non-stop a file upon a Ampang LRT extension scandal, afterwards maybe a open could have had a little toleration as well as acceptance of a authorities' movement upon Rafizi.
If MACC had acted upon a alleged crime concerned in th! e Scorpen! e purchase, afterwards maybe a open could have had a little toleration as well as acceptance of a authorities' movement upon Rafizi.
Whistleblowers will not have second thoughts in coming MACC or a police with any damning report as well as evidence opposite any company or entity, though alas...
Odin:In a democratic country run by politicians who may not be angels though have been distant improved than those in a BN, then, yes, Rafizi should have left to a MACC with a information.
But you have been articulate about a pseudo-democratic country run by politicians who have been not usually fascist as well as corrupt, though they also have supervision agencies such as a MACC serving their interest only.
! Rafizi h as had no choice though to make a report public.
Swipenter:Both Najib as well as MACC have been carrying credit issues. The open do not have enough certitude in them to carry out their responsibilities without fright as well as favour.
We have seen too most cases of resourceful prosecution. This is an additional great example. - Malaysiakini
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment