I suppose, in a end, it is all about governing body as great as not about justice. Hence Najib would have to do what is politically beneficial to him. But this total part can go possibly way. If they win a interest it can backfire. If they remove a interest it can additionally backfire. It will all rely upon how they operative their notice management. And Najib's boys do not have what it takes to do correct notice management.
THE CORRIDORS OF POWER Raja Petra Kamarudin
First, review today's headlines object fromThe Malaysian Insider(below). Next, next that, review what we wrote 4 years ago upon 21st Jul 2008. Well, we know me, we only can't resist an 'I told we so'article during your convenience things spin out a approach we pronounced they would. So, this is my ego during work. So what? Sue me then. But when we am right we am right. What some-more can we say?
we have pronounced this before as great as we am starting to contend it again. There have been those who have been so discerning to brush off my pieces as storytelling, far-fetched, spinning, or even officious lies. My response has regularly been: it competence take 5 years or longer, though in a future what we contend is regularly proven correct in a end. And in this box has it not, nonetheless again, been proven correct?
The decider appears to determine with me upon a few points. First would be which there is a disbelief as to how they procured a justification opposite Anwar. They have been really sloppy as great as as great most people were involved. Thus there is a risk of someone talking. The most appropriate swindling is a swindling of one. When some-more than a single chairman is involved, it becomes really dangerous which there would be a leak.
Next, a same ! people w ho were concerned in a Sodomy 1 part were additionally concerned in Sodomy 2. This includes AG Gani Patail, IGP Musa Hassan (retired) as great as SAC Rodwan Mohd Yusof. And these same 3 who messed up Sodomy 1 additionally messed up Sodomy 2 -- a bunch of bungling amateurs.
In a Sodomy 1 judgment, a Federal Court had ruled which whilst they competence be convinced which Anwar is guilty, a Prosecution, however, unsuccessful to infer Anwar's guilt. Hence a Federal Court overturned a guilty verdict. This is opposite to what a trail decider said: which Anwar had unsuccessful to infer his innocence.
In a rapist indictment, it is not up to a Accused to infer his or her innocence. It is up to a Prosecution to infer guilt. And, this, a Prosecution had unsuccessful to do. Hence a Federal Court had to recover Anwar back in Sep 2004. And a same bungling fools who were during a back of Sodomy 1 were additionally during a back of Sodomy 2. So can we expect a outcome to go any differently?
Next point: Anwar was convicted in a Sodomy 1 conference formed only upon a sworn statement of a declare (the purported plant of a sodomy act). They attempted that, again, in a Sodomy 2 trial. However, whilst in a Sodomy 1 conference a decider pronounced which nonetheless a declare is dangerous as great as keeps changing his testimony, his sworn statement can still be believed (in alternative words, a declare is a liar though what he says can be supposed as evidence), in a Sodomy 2 trial, a decider said, "Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan's allegation which he was sodomised by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim was uncorroborated as great as a self-assurance formed only upon a accuser's sworn statement would have been unsafe." In alternative words, a sworn statement of a declare (the purported plant of a sodomy act) needs corroboration. His solitary sworn statement is not great enough.
In a Sodomy 1 trial, a conference decider invented his own rules. An dangerous declare who keeps changing his sw! orn stat ement is acceptable. Uncorroborated justification is acceptable. The Accused contingency infer his innocence, not a Prosecution infer guilt. But a Federal Court disagreed with these views.
In a Sodomy 2 trial, a conference decider inspected correct convention. If a justification is suspect afterwards it contingency be rejected. Corroboration is required. The great of a disbelief contingency be since to a Accused. The Accused need not infer his or her innocence. Instead, a Prosecution contingency infer guilt.
Okay, what happens now? Will a Prosecution right away interest a conference judge's decision? And if they do, will a Federal Court determine with a conference decider or will they overturn a verdict?
In an interest hearing, they cannot deliver brand brand brand brand new justification even if after they do discover brand brand brand brand new evidence. The arguments in an interest conference contingency be centred upon what was argued during a trial. The focus would be possibly a conference decider erred. we disbelief a Federal Court would disagree with a outcome of a conference judge. So maybe a supervision should 'save face' as great as dont think about about appealing. If they do interest as great as a Federal Court upholds a outcome of a conference judge, this would be an even bigger slap in a government's face. People would be even some-more convinced which Anwar is a plant of a conspiracy.
Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak contingency recollect which a Sodomy 2 part was during Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi's as great as Syed Hamid Albar's time. Hence Naib's hands have been 'clean', so to speak. And a actuality which Anwar was clear during Najib's watch augurs great for a Prime Minister. If a matter is right away dropped Najib can measure some points. But if they interest this box as great as they win a appeal, Najib would be seen as reneging upon his guarantee of reforms. Of course, if they remove a appeal, afterwards Najib's spin-doctors can reg! ularly c ontend which this proves which a courts have been independent.
we suppose, in a end, it is all about governing body as great as not about justice. Hence Najib would have to do what is politically beneficial to him. But this total part can go possibly way. If they win a interest it can backfire. If they remove a interest it can additionally backfire. It will all rely upon how they operative their notice management. And Najib's boys do not have what it takes to do correct notice management.
*************************************
Sodomy II created judgment: Unsafe to crook formed only upon Saiful's testimony
(The Malaysian Insider, 3rd Jul 2012) - Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan's allegation which he was sodomised by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim was uncorroborated as great as a self-assurance formed only upon a accuser's sworn statement would have been unsafe, a Kuala Lumpur High Court concluded in a created visualisation of a antithesis leader's Sodomy II conference which was released today.
High Court decider Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah pronounced in his 80-page created visualisation which it could not be 100 per cent sure about a integrity of DNA samples carefully thought about by supervision chemist Dr Seah Lay Hong.
He ruled which it is not safe to rely upon a formula of Dr Seah's hearing of a DNA evidence.
"There was no justification to corroborate a justification of Saiful upon factum of penetration," he said.
"The justice is regularly reluctant to crook an indicted chairman formed only upon a uncorroborated justification of a complainant. Therefore a indicted is clear as great as liberated of a charge," he ruled.
On Jan 9, a High Court clear Anwar of a assign of sodomising his former male aide Mohd Saiful (picture).
Speaking in justice then, a decider had ruled which a assign had not finished sufficient to infer Anwar had committe! d sodomy opposite Saiful.
Anwar, 64, had been similarly indicted of sodomy over a decade ago as great as was found guilty. He outlayed 6 years in prison before being exonerated.
The High Court's preference this time had since a progress to Anwar's Pakatan Rakyat (PR) pact's skeleton to take over Putrajaya.
The assign says it skeleton to interest a preference as great as has 10 days from currently to do so.
*************************************
How, nonetheless again, they have been trying to fabricate justification opposite Anwar
(Malaysia Today, 21st Jul 2008) - It was a great celebration which night. The Chemistry Department was so pleased they had an indisputable box opposite Anwar Ibrahim they motionless to celebrate. And a RM25,000 celebration was financed by a Good Samaritan who was delighted which this time, unlike last time, they have got Anwar by a balls.
RM25,000 is not a lot to outlay upon a celebration if it is a celebration to applaud a wedding of a Prime Minister. Last year, when Abdullah Ahmad Badawi got tied together to a Maid from Putrajaya, they outlayed millions. RM25,000 is additionally not a lot to outlay upon a jubilee a day Najib Tun Razak eventually takes over as Prime Minister in 2010. Rosmah Mansor spends some-more than which upon a handbag. But RM25,000 is positively a lot to outlay upon a celebration to applaud a 'success' of a Chemistry Department in being able to nail Anwar's balls to a wall.
Why does a Good Samaritan need to unite a RM25,000 celebration for a Chemistry Department staff? What is there to celebrate? Do they regularly applaud with a RM25,000 celebration during your convenience they attain in cracking a case? Or was this an once-in-a-lifetime jubilee for successfully coming up with a 'evidence' to send Anwar to prison for during slightest 10 years, which will ensure he will never be able to form a brand brand brand! brand n ew sovereign supervision upon 16 Sep 2008?
Hold upon a whilst though. Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi pronounced which Anwar contingency proffer his 'new' DNA profile. The 1998 DNA form which a military have upon record is 'too old', argued Abdullah. The police, in turn, pronounced which if Anwar refuses to proffer his 'new' DNA form afterwards they would have to obtain a justice sequence to force him to do so. Hmm..there appears to be most things wrong with all this.
Firstly, if a Chemistry Department has already wrapped up a box as great as a indisputable 'evidence' opposite Anwar has already been secured, afterwards because a need for Anwar's brand brand brand brand new DNA profile? DNA profiles never expire. Would a military additionally need Anwar's 'new' fingerprints since a a single they took 10 years ago has 'expired'? Fingerprints never shift from a day we were born till a day we die. And a same goes for DNA profiles as well.
If we can remember, they once dug up Napoleon Bonaparte's grave as great as did an hearing to infer he had died of arsenic poisoning. And Napoleon died upon 5 May 1821, which is some-more than 187 years ago. You mean to contend which Anwar's DNA form of 10 years ago is alreadybasi?
The law is, a indisputable 'evidence' which a Chemistry Department not long ago conjured is formed upon Anwar's citation of 1998. So they need a brand brand brand brand new citation antiquated 2008. If not, if Anwar calls in an eccentric unfamiliar consultant to review a Chemistry Department's evidence, he or she competence only discover which a supposed 'evidence' is actually 10 years aged as great as not from a twenty-six Jun 2008 'sodomy' incident as purported by a government.
Yes, that's right, they not only can discuss it possibly a supposed 'semen' upon Saiful's hoop skirt belongs to Anwar, they can additionally discuss it possibly it is from Sep 1998 when they first took Anwar's specimen, or possibly it is ! antiquat ed twenty-six Jun 2008 as purported by a government.
The 'evidence' is ready. The semen citation upon Saiful's hoop skirt has been 'confirmed' as Anwar's. The only problem is if they allow an eccentric unfamiliar consultant to do an review upon a Chemistry Department's findings, he or she competence confirm which a citation is 10 years aged as great as not antiquated twenty-six Jun 2008 as alleged.
So they need to sell a Sep 1998 citation with a brand brand brand brand new a single antiquated Jul 2008. And which is because Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi as great as Syed Hamid Albar, as great as all those others, have asked Anwar to proffer his brand brand brand brand new specimen. They need this brand brand brand brand new citation to 'prove' which a semen upon Saiful's hoop skirt is antiquated twenty-six Jun 2008 as great as not Sep 1998. And Abdullah himself 'confirmed' this when he asked Anwar to proffer his brand brand brand brand new citation whereas a aged citation is great sufficient if it is only compulsory for DNA profiling -- only which it would not pass a exam if an eccentric unfamiliar consultant was to review a Chemistry Department's 'evidence' as great as afterwards come out with a inform which says a citation is 10 years old.
Yes, in Sep 1998 they already took Anwar's specimen. But they can't make use of it as justification in this ultimate sodomy allegation. They need to 'update' a justification as great as unless they can force Anwar to give them his brand brand brand brand new citation afterwards a justification will be shot full of holes. And which is because a military had to reluctantly recover Anwar upon military bail a single day after his dramatic Hollywood-style arrest. They had to possibly recover him or bring him to justice to be charged. But how to assign Anwar when a justification is defective? And justification of Anwar's supposed sodomy crime supported by a citation from Sep 1998 will positively be poor as great as will not st! and up i n court. Anwar is purported to have sodomised Saiful upon twenty-six Jun 2008, not in Sep 1998.
Now can we see how a slime-ball AG as great as scumbag IGP work? And these dual smooth creatures have been a same slime-balls as great as scumbags who built justification in 1998 which resulted in Anwar having to outlay 6 years in jail. And am we committing an act of mutiny as great as rapist defamation in saying this? we positively goal so. And, whilst we have been during it, because not we commit nonetheless an additional 'crime'? we am starting to credit a AG as great as IGP of fabricating justification as great as of intimidating witnesses.
You see, they asked a sure alloy from a sure sanatorium to conduct an hearing upon Saiful. The alloy did so as great as he came out with a inform which pronounced there is no justification Anwar had ever penetrated or sodomised a young man. The military afterwards picked up a alloy as great as incarcerated him for 3 days. As much as they attempted to force him to shift his inform to implicate Anwar he refused to do so.
Until today, a alloy stands by his inform which there is no justification Anwar had sodomised Saiful. He knows he is starting to be done to pay for this though he doesn't care. He is not starting to shift his inform as great as contend which Anwar sodomised Saiful whatever they do to him. Exasperated, a military had to recover Anwar upon personal down payment or military bail. The alloy refuses to alloy his inform as great as neither does Anwar wish to proffer his brand brand brand brand new specimen.
The 'evidence' opposite Anwar is no good. They right away need to look for an additional approach to 'prove' which Anwar sodomised Saiful. In a meantime, let us see if a AG will be making an additional military inform opposite me as great as possibly a IGP is starting to arrest me as great as assign me in justice for mutiny as great as rapist defamation for this ultimate allegation of mine.
! Hey, w e already face 4 charges of mutiny as great as rapist defamation. What have been an additional dual or 3 charges? The critical thing is not possibly we get sent to prison or not. What is critical is which a world is told which they have been attempting, nonetheless again, to fabricate justification opposite Anwar Ibrahim. And which is value starting to prison for.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment