WSJ, Mr Anwar will not plead guilty because the court is his political stage

Chandra says Anwar is no GhandiIf Mr. Anwar wants to use polite disobedience, he can't fake to be innocent during a same time. - WSJ, Review & Outlook Asia, Malaysian People's Court - Anwar's Civil Disobedience as well as a Next Elections

The WSJ should know Anwar Ibrahim better by now. If Anwar pleads guilty as well as pays a excellent as a WSJ suggests, he doesn't get limit mileage. The Malaysian courts have turn Anwar's most in effect domestic stage.

The Sodomy 2 is a undiluted example. He as well as his lawyers spread out a box for an eternity, subjecting a judges, a prosecutors as well as a government to his politics as well as to ridicule. Delay after check after delay.

And now, Anwar's ultimate grand design: his cynical as well as deliberate violation of a Peaceful Assembly Act, from a impulse he signaled a Dataran Merdeka crack to a impulse when he knew he would face charges to a calculated employing of a ex-solicitor-general who prosecuted him.

In Anwar's grand design, a government unwittingly plays his game. The ground is purely political, which additionally feeds into Anwar's slickdemagoguery as well as realisation which his Siri Jelajah tours across a republic gets peanuts in throng reply (See Outsyed a Box inform upon Anwar's interest in Pengerang) though a Federal court box will inhere these reaction: huge adoring cr! owds to satisfy Anwar'snarcissism, preening to media hogging, especially special interviews with unfamiliar media, a pour out in support from NGOs pitching democraticideals as well as buying more face time with unfamiliar backers as well as governments who would be wondering if Anwar was any more effective.

Anwar's plan is simple: mangle a law in any approach trustworthy nonetheless say an air of so-called dignity, which he is being politically persecuted so which he can exploit a courts as a undiluted domestic height to push his single-minded mania to turn Prime Minister.

Anwar will discuss it we he does not have conviction in a law though during a same time he is usually a first to resort to legal action. The Sodomy 2 hearing is a undiluted example: he used lawyer Karpal Singh and all imaginable avenues provides by a system he pronounced he didn't trust to lengthen a box to a limit of his advantage. It has turn standard of him to put everyone else though himself upon trial.

The WSJ paper suggests which a editors found, maybe by approach of a video justification as well as maybe from reports upon te ground, which Anwar is guilty as hell for inciting a sold incident during Bersih 3 for which he is being charged. We all saw a video clips. So because is Anwae sanctimonious to be a victim of a "politically motivated" charge? we think a WSJ should stop sanctimonious not to see why.

Even before a charge was read, Anwar had already suspicion of a approach to maximize a mileage, by appointing a male who once prosecuted him to stick upon his defence team! Now, which is a genius of Anwar Ibrahim which a writer of a WSj paper had grossly underestimated. That is a approach of Anwar Ibrahim. That is what the law has been reduced to - a height for an individual's non-stop domestic campaigning. The WSJ may not see it, though Malaysians are not as blind.

Read additionally Cha! ndra Muz affar's take upon WSJ's article, Why It's No Civil Disobedience.