Proton is the price we pay for brainless patriotism

Koon Yew Yin

protonThe first of Proton National Bhd in 1983 was a large costly mistake to proceed with. Billions of ringgit from taxpayers have been lost in a process.

The haemorrhage could not be stanched until usually not prolonged ago when Khazanah Nasional Berhad sole off a 43 percent interest in Proton to DRB-Hicom a few months ago. Malaysians have been wondering is this finally an end to a unhappy tale of a government's incursion in to a prolongation of a supposed 'national car' or will a weight upon taxpayers as well as automobile owners be one after another in alternative brand brand brand brand new ways?

A revisit of this white elephant plan is necessary to beget a incomparable public discourse especially amongst taxpayers who should be some-more concerned as to where all a taxation income they've been paying has gone to.

One uncomplicated arrogance which appears to have been finished by a initiator of a inhabitant automobile plan Dr Mahathir Mohamad is which an attention which is flourishing yearly should be profitable.It is not. In fact, attention interpretation shows which a sum increase of all a automobile companies over a final decades amount to usually a medium return, as well as which usually for a fittest in a industry.

The British experience

Consider a case of British Leyland, a vehicle-manufacturing association shaped in a United Kingdom in 1968. It was partly nationalised in 1975 with a supervision formulating a brand brand brand brand new holding company. The association incorporated most of a British- owned motor automobile industry, as well as hold 40% of a UK automobile market.

Despite containing essential marques such as Jaguar, Rover as well as Lan! d Rover, as well as a best-selling Mini, British Leyland had a uneasy history. In 1986 it was renamed as a Rover Group, later to turn MG Rover Group, which went in to administration department in 2005.This finished mass automobile prolongation by British-owned manufacturers.

Today, most British automobile marques have transferred their ownership to foreign companies. For e.g. MG as well as a Austin, Morris as well as Wolseley marques have all turn partial of China's SAIC Motor Corporation Ltd.

Mistake avoidable

Why Dr Mahathir unsuccessful to sense anything from a catastrophic British automobile attention experience is something which utterly escapes most Malaysians. Surely any great personality would have gotten his officers to do due diligence.

If they had finished so, they would have found which a attention even with year-on-year rises in sales is not upon trial to beget great returns to shareholders. Notwithstanding a prolonged convention of successful automobile manufacture as well as a country's highly developed economy, a attention in a UK still unsuccessful to have profits.

The reason for this situation is given one of a forces which extent profitability is a intensity of rivalry in between automobile companies from around a world. This leads to oversupply as well as vigour upon prices, serve exacerbated by a high grade of freedom for brand brand brand brand new competitors to come in a industry.

Unless there is an huge inner marketplace such as China's or a United States, as well as you can take value of a manage to buy of scale, small producers such as Malaysia have been forever cursed to a minor placing, or bankruptcy, in a marketplace.

Played out by Mitsubishi

As distant as Proton is concerned, Mahathir's mistake in ignoring a mercantile fundamentals of a attention was compounded by a lack of imagination or comparative va! lue to f urnish cars. The anticipated record send from Mitsubishi did not take place.

This should have been anticipated. Why should Mitsubishi send their expertise to Malaysia when it can control a gait of send to maximize a profits? In fact, a top supervision of Proton should ask Mitsubishi to open their books to see how most profit they have finished from Proton given it began operation.

Mitsubishi knew which Proton could not do without them as well as they were utterly happy to go on creation income from Proton whilst a association here one after another to bleed to death.

Equally critical was a bad quality of management. Just prior to a privatization exercise, Proton had amassed RM4 billion during Tengku Mahaleel Ariff's reign as arch executive military officer but a cash reserves had forsaken to RM600 million during his successor Mohammed Azlan Hashim's stewardship, according to Mahathir.

To encourage people to buy Proton, a supervision increasing a import avocation for alternative cars as well as automobile parts. As a result, a consumers have suffered. For over thirty years you have had to pay aloft prices for all cars together with Proton. Even this has not been sufficient to save Proton which has been sole 5 times already.

Another subject to ask is because few automobile manufacturers, until recently, appear to get in to bankruptcy? If so, afterwards prices can rise relative to cost as well as shareholders can get a fair return.

There have been two main reasons.In a small countries there is always a perennial confidence of managers as well as shareholders. In Malaysia, a reason is different. Here, a supervision has been changing manners as well as regulations to hinder alternative cars from entering a marketplace whilst providing special favours together with an ever ready supply of monetary benefit to keep Proton afloat.

The end outcome is which a small Malaysians have finished up with some-more costly cars of alternative brands whilst most Malaysi! ans have had small preference but to buy Proton a bad substitute.

This is a price you have to pay for brainless patriotism.

Proton's as well as a everlasting problems

Ours is a sorry tale which is a classical case investigate upon how not to set up a automobile industry. As with a inhabitant airline, we introduce which a special march upon a experience with Proton be offering in a Institute of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad's Thoughts.

What improved approach to honour a ex-premier than a post-graduate march upon his pet plan a National Car as well as mouth-watering him to be a guest lecturer. we am certain he will have lots to share as well as most people to censure as to because a plan has failed.

Earlier this year aristocrat Syed Mokhtar Al-Bukhary was authorised to take full control of Proton. Since a sale, Proton's problems have one after another by a loss-making subsidiary, Lotus. In March, a firm was forced to put in place a team of consultants to conduct an examination upon a Lotus group of companies.

The need for this examination was impending in light of a monetary obligation of Lotus in a form of a 270 million (RM1.3 billion) syndicated loan taken during a end of 2010, for which Proton had given a corporate guarantee.

In March, Proton, in a third quarter results, remarkable which a auxiliary was in a technical breach of certain post-drawdown covenants upon a long-term loan. For now, a loan amounting to RM1.01billion has been re-classified as a short-term loan as during Dec 31 until a taking of capitulation for a prolongation of time.

Although a brand brand brand brand new owner of Proton positively has low pockets (he is a 7th richest male in Malaysia) as well as owns a commercial operation sovereignty which covers ports, a postal service, power, defence as well as monetary services, besides a! utomobil es, you can expect him to replenish his waste by raising a prices serve upon Proton to illustrate burdening a automobile buyers, as well as by charging aloft prices for a alternative products as well as services which he is concerned with.

Any which way, a Malaysian consumer will go on to be suckered by a inhabitant automobile debacle.

Read More @ Source



More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: