So since have been we still so angry? You longed for Tunku Aziz out. You were indignant which he remained in DAP. The longer he stays in DAP a nastier a comments get. Now which he has left which is a finish of a make a difference as good as we no longer need to speak about him or about what he does. He is giveaway to do what he wants, with whom he wants, as good as in whatever manner which he wants.
THE CORRIDORS OF POWER Raja Petra Kamarudin
Most of we here, a majority of we who commented inMalaysia Today, longed for Tunku Abdul Aziz Tunku Ibrahim to renounce or get sacked from DAP as shortly as he gave his views regarding a Bersih 3.0 rally late final month. Tunku Aziz was called all sorts of foul things -- traitor, turncoat, Umno mole, Umno stooge, Trojan horse, amongst a milder names he was called. There were, in fact, some-more degrading labels which a little of we used upon him.
The renouned sentiments crop up to be we longed for to see a at a back of of Tunku Aziz. DAP does not need people like Tunku Aziz. If he can't shut his mouth as good as toe a celebration line afterwards he should leave prior to DAP sacks him. And DAP contingency sack him if he refuses to leave, most of we opined.
Your 'prophesy' was which Tunku Aziz would leave DAP. And he would leave since he is a Barisan Nasional man. He is merely a plant, a Trojan horse, sent to DAP to do damage inside a party. Hence it is a foregone end which he would, earlier or later, leave DAP to 'return' to Barisan Nasional.
That was what most of we felt. And which was what most of we expressed. we as good wrote an essay calledDear Tunku Abdul Aziz Tunku Ibrahimeight days ago, which we am sure most of we have read. If we have not, afterwards we can review it here:http://www.malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/no-holds-barred/49188-dear-tunku-abdul-aziz-tunku-ibrahim
Most of we who commented (114 comments altogether) concluded with what we wrote in which article. What most of we who commented did not catch is which we was being sarcastic. we was not talking to Tunku Aziz. we was talking toYOU! And if we did not catch my drift afterwards as good bad, we am not starting to rubbish my time teaching we English.
So, now, Tunku Aziz has resigned, as what most of we wanted. But have been we happy now? Apparently not! You have been still not happy. Now we whack him for resigning.
Look, we longed for him out so he left. How he leaves is his commercial operation -- either he announces it upon TV or he sends in a resignation minute or he whispers in Lim Guan Eng's ear. Once we ask for a divorce, as good as a divorce is granted, we no longer have any right to question what as good as how things have been done. You have been no longer together and, therefore, we no longer have any obligations to each other.
YOUwanted a divorce. So recollect that. If your ex-spouse decides to date someone else after that, we no longer have any commercial operation to contend otherwise. You no longer have any rights over your ex-partner. Your ex-partner is right away giveaway to do what he or she wants. You have no some-more contend about what your ex-partner does.
So since have been we still so angry? You longed for Tunku Aziz out. You were indignant which he remained in DAP. The longer he stays in DAP a nastier a comments get. Now which he has left which is a finish of a make a difference as good as we no longer need to speak about him or about what he does. He is giveaway to do what he wants, with whom he wants, as good as in whatever manner which he wants.
That is what divorces have been a! ll about , to giveaway us from a bonds of marriage as good as from obligations of being loyal as good as faithful to one another.
Now, since was Tunku Aziz treated with colour with colour so shabbily? most people have been asking, Malays in particular, generally non-partisan as good as fence-sitter Malays, those who do not have any celebration affiliations though merely want to see great governance.
You contingency remember, there have been 16 million eligible electorate in Malaysia with about twelve million plus registered to vote, roughly half of them Malays. About half these twelve million have been members of domestic parties. It could even be reduction if we cruise which Umno claims to have 3.5 million members though their membership list has been padded.
Let's contend which about 5 million or so, reduction a 'phantoms', have been members of domestic parties. This would meant some-more than 7 million do not go to any celebration and, therefore, do not caring most for celebration politics.
That is a really sizeable figure indeed. So let us omit a estimated 5 million celebration members as good as demeanour during a 7 million non-party members instead. What do they think, generally a Malays?
What they have been meditative is which most alternative DAP leaders have voiced their opinions as good as have criticised or against sure antithesis policies as good as stands. Take Karpal Singh, as one example. He has pronounced most things against PAS as good as even Anwar Ibrahim. He pronounced Anwar is not fit to be a Opposition Leader. He has pronounced he would not sit during a same table as PAS, let alone form a coalition with which Islamic party. And so on, a list can go on.
Did any of we call Karpal a Trojan horse, a Barisan Nasional stooge, a mole, a traitor, a turncoat, etc., or which he had been paid for off? Did we demand he renounce or be sacked? What about a Chinese leaders of DAP who chided DAP or a DAP leaders in open (eve! n up to a final couple of days this is still starting on)? Why were all these people, a non-Malay leaders of DAP, not since a same harsh diagnosis as good as vilified a way which Tunku Aziz was?
Malaysians have been simple-minded people,Malaysia Todayreaders included. And a end of a simple thoughts would be really simple. And their end is: since Tunku Aziz is Malay. That was since he was treated with colour with colour so cruelly as good as vilified. And which was additionally since a alternative non-Malay leaders were not subjected to which same treatment.
Hence, we have been at a back of where we started. The whole affair has taken upon secular connotations. What Tunku Aziz was subjected to as good as which none of a alternative DAP leaders were subjected to was merely since Tunku Aziz is Malay as good as for no alternative reason.
Is this a wrong conclusion? In a game of governing body it is notice as good as not law which matters. And which is a notice either it is loyal or not. Have we as good not had to endure this as good as am still fast it? So since should we as good not have to suffer this?
Tunku Aziz's concern was which Bersih competence not only become aroused though would be incited secular as well. A chairman like Tunku Aziz who has lived for some-more than 70 years would have seen a lot of things. And being a regressive Malay gentleman which he is, he sees things otherwise from those of us who have been younger, some-more aggressive, as good as will not bashful away from a fisticuff. (I mean, how can we bashful away from a fisticuff when we once 'moved' with a Long Fu Tong).
How can it be racial? we may ask. Was not PAS involved? Were not Pak Samad as good as Anwar Ibrahim as good as Azmin Ali additionally upon a front lines? So a Malays have been really most a partial of Bersih as a non-Malays are.
Sure, there were most Malays in a Communist Party of Malay (CPM) as well. In fact, a little of a leaders wer! e Malay. Furthermore, a little of those who attacked a military stations as good as shot a military officers dead were Malays. But does which stop a Malays from a villages from meditative which a CPM is Chinese as good as which it is all about a Chinese perplexing to disintegrate a Malay government?
Speak to any maestro soldier if we happen to know any. Try to indicate which a CPM was a multi-racial transformation as good as not a Chinese movement. See how most would agree with you. They will swear which a enemy was Chinese as good as which a CPM was Chinese. It was not multi-racial as far as they have been concerned.
Is which a law or is which merely a perception? Does it matter? It is what they believe. The army veterans have been convinced which they were fighting a Chinese CPM as good as which is was about defending a Malay government.
Actually which is a really unfair assessment of Bersih. Bersih 1.0 in Nov 2007 was almost wholly Malay nonetheless a little of a leaders were not. Bersih 2.0 as good as Bersih 3.0 were some-more 'balanced' than Bersih 1.0. We saw some-more non-Malay participation, which is good.
But these people have been not seeking during those who marched upon a streets, a multi-racial crowd which we saw. They have been seeking during those who they imagine to be at a back of Bersih, or some-more accurately, a viewed dark hands at a back of Bersih.
And herein lies a problem. Hence, was Tunku Aziz out of line in expressing his views or should we instead have taken stock of what he pronounced as good as covered our arses scrupulously as good as not concede Bersih to be incited into a secular issue? Anyway, whilst upon a theme of army veterans, demeanour during a pictures next of a maestro soldiers outward Ambiga's house.
This was a kind of thing which Tunku Aziz was perplexing to equivocate as good as right away it has happened. Sadly, however, Tunku Aziz has left since most of we longed for him to leave. And ! right aw ay we find which Tunku Aziz was not as good off a symbol in his fears.I suppose, as they say, history will decider we though only after we have gone. So we need time to answer a question as to either Tunku Aziz was a hypocrite or a male with foresight. Time will tell.
Okay, what have been we all starting to do about this? Can we have a little volunteers to do a 24-7 'rukun tetangga' outward Ambiga's house? How most of we have been rebuilt to scapegoat your time to proffer for ensure avocation so which a third they 'invade' Ambiga's residence there would be sufficient people to urge her as good as die for her. we review so most comments here inMalaysia Todayurging her on. It is right away time for we to come brazen as good as urge what we hold in. Or have been we merely set of keys warriors who post comments from a safety of your homes/offices?
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment