Who provoked the violence?


http://p.twimg.com/ArlJWNfCAAIUq2B.jpg
The troops explain which a few demonstrators who pennyless by a blockade to get onto Dataran Merdeka annoyed a troops to retaliate? Is which so? Is which violence? Violence upon whom, a police, a fence?
Jackson Ng, Retired Journalist
In a mass convene or gathering, everyone knows which it takes usually a tiny spark to means mayhem. And tellurian nature, as good as animals, is such which defence is a usually reply to attack.
So, let us break down in to parts what happened during Bersih 3.0 prior to we fall in to a promotion trap of a immorality Barisan Nasional (BN) government.
Bersih was meant to be a sit-in (repeat SIT-IN) upon Dataran Merdeka. For a troops as well as BN morons, do we know what is sit-in? It is peaceful.
But a Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) as well as a mayor motionless which a venue cannot be used by demonstrators, usually for national events.
In a first place, Dataran Merdeka does not go to them. Secondly, Dataran Merdeka has, in past, been used for non-national events by BN as well as a in isolation sector.
Isn't a rakyat's democratic right to demand for satisfactory as well as purify elections not of national interest? Why is a Umno-led BN supervision so fearful to implement electoral reforms which facilitate satisfactory elections to be conducted? The actuality which BN rejects Bersih's due list of electoral reforms is admission of a unwashed ways to hold upon to power with a use of brute force.
The Bersih supporters incited up in a tens of thousands but not a singular a single of them carried weapons. They only marched towards Dataran Square.
So, how did it spin violent? Again, a BN-controlled troops did not learn from their past mistak! es in Be rsih 1.0 as well as Bersih 2.0.
The firing of chemical-laced H2O as well as tear-gas upon a rakyat is a troops arms of attack to provoke a masses.
The troops explain which a few demonstrators who pennyless by a blockade to get onto Dataran Merdeka annoyed a troops to retaliate? Is which so? Is which violence? Violence upon whom, a police, a fence?
The troops contend a demonstrators had damaged a law by violation by a security block which prevented a demonstrators to get in to a open as well as empty field. Is which justification for a troops to go for a kill?
we am sure if a troops had only let them in, as well as afterwards arrested them a single by a single as well as take them divided in black maria, no attack would have occurred. It is a shooting of containing alkali laced H2O as well as rip gas which annoyed a strife as well as mayhem.
There is another credible declare to a attack propagated by a BN police. The press photographers as well as reporters. The attack upon journalists, drop as well as seizure of cameras have been testimony of a BN police's attempt to censor their immorality ways of regulating attack upon a rakyat to serve their political masters.
Yes! Congratulations to Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak for another glorious universe display of Malaysia's policing ways to uphold democracy.
We have been again a concentration of attention in a universe as well as also a laughing stock. We have been now no better off than Burma's troops junta.
Read More @ Source



More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus | Court esy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: