Reposting: By Mahathir Mohamad's own admission (in The Malay Dilemma as well as elsewhere), the Malay seizure as well as function of Malaysia equals the white man's advance of America as well as Australia. As Anglo-Saxons later came to consult upon themselves the ultimate woman monarch as well as management upon those lands, so did the Malays upon the peninsula, Sabah as well as Sarawak. White man even wrote which down for the Malays, in the English, in to the constitution. The result? It's next from the posting two years ago. No wonder the Umno Malay is so hated by close to everyone else though tolerated by the MCA Chinese since of Kongzi.
If Malay supremacy equals White supremacy isn't perverse enough, Anglophiles, among both the DAP Chinese as well as Malays, the Bangsa types, reason up America as well as Australia as 'democratic' models to run Malaysia. But this was predictable: Malaysia was sired by the same Anglo-Saxons who seized Australia as well as America. White people even taught Malays how to write in the Roman alphabet. Thus, when PAS converts Kedah in to Ayatollah rule, it becomes usually dessert for the Anglophiles, the Tunku Aziz as well as Rahmans, Mahathir's sons, Peter Petras, the Lim Family, the Hannahs, Thomases as well as so on.
*****
Remember Omar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the 23-year-old man who boarded the flight in Amsterdam upon Yuletide Day with the explosve in his underpants? He might be Nigerian with Islamist connectors in Malaysia though he was bred in England.
Says Wole Soyinka (above), the Nigerian writer as well as playwright (The Bacchae of Euripides! ): "England is the cesspit. England is the breeding belligerent of fundamentalist Muslims. Its social logic is to allow all religions to evangelise openly. But this is illogic, since zero of the alternative religions evangelise baleful violence. And yet England allows it."
Why is Britain the approach it is? asks Tunku Varadarajan of Soyinka. Answer: "This is partial of the character of Great Britain. Colonialism bred an innate arrogance, though when we undertake which sort of majestic adventure, which audacity gives approach to the feeling of accommodativeness. You take pride in your openness." And so it is, he says, which Britain lets everyone evangelise whatever they want: It confirms the self-image of greatness.
For the taste of this British place to live as well as openness, cruise its tellurian rights regime. Another the single entrance up underneath which complement of administration is the Equality Bill, which forbids taste by anyone or any organisation, which is, private entities, upon drift of contend ethnicity as well as religion. It sounds uplifting as well as liberal, though it makes being tellurian the crime since if the single were to be running, say, the newspaper for PAS it would be ideally healthy to sinecure usually those subscribing to its eremite ethos no make the difference how beastly. The Equality Bill makes this taste criminal; in England it compels the Church to sinecure minorities, communists, gays, ulamas, the riff-raff. Says the writer Tim Black:
At emanate here is leisure of association. At the most personal, intimate level, this is the leisure we take for granted. It's the leisure to select one's company, to select who the single associates with as well as who the single doesn't. As (a) part, this leisure to give usual ideology or interests an organisational form, others, who do not share those ideology or interests, will be excluded taste goes hand-in-hand ! with lei sure of association."
If all this seems facile that, perversely, equality equates to to be indiscriminate; which being human, to love as well as to despise, is naturally discriminatory as an unique peculiarity they have been not to Britain, not anymore, since the Brits have been no longer capable of even small particular judgements. All bland tellurian decisions have been reduced to weighing in between the legal as well as the illegal; tellurian family have been surrendered to the Law, the State, which afterwards decides who we might employ, to who we let your house, with who we nap with, as well as so on. An Islamic state is its perfect mirror reflection. Such the state sequence tellurian family underneath the veneer of Islam, while physical Britain underneath the religiosity of liberalism. Yet, underneath both, they serve total fascism. (In this respect, what Anwar Ibrahim pronounced about Lina Joy, which she contingency not be permitted to alone confirm her sacrament upon her IC, is revealing in to the man's right-wing dictatorship though dark underneath the liberal veneer when Anwar stands articulate in front of White people as well as by the facade of Islam in front of Malays.)
Now, if England is the cesspit, as well as the world's greatest exporter of terrorists, what does which make of Malaysia? The sewage, the excrement for the sump? Possibly. After the Nigerians, Petra Kamarudin is pronounced to have left there. Here is the fetid, mosquito swamp overflowing with the over-abundance which contingency go somewhere; the nation bursting in the seams with the narcissistic illiterates of the royal wanted list (Petra), the nazi (Ibrahim Ali), the Pendatang (Rusdi Mustapha), the chosen extremist (Mahathir Mohamad), the Bangsa Allah types (Haris Ibrahim), the Islam-or-nothing ustaz (Zulkifli Noordin), the Islam-For-All ulama (Hasan Ali), as well as of course, during the tip of the pecking order, the brand new politics ayatollah as well as soothsayer (Anwar Ibrahim).
So! , what i s the single to do with this really Islamic, multi-coloured organisation of eremite pinheads? How to save the country? Soyinka's answer lengthened to Malaysia:
"I think this is where our space station engineers as well as astronauts can come to our rescue. We should arrange all those who have been pure as well as cannot abide alternative faiths, put them all in rockets, as well as glow them in to space."
Soyinka, however, doesn't dwell upon the single alternative point: because do the Islamists, even if they don't actively seek out Britain, invariably end up there or during its Anglo-Saxon cousins, Australia*, New Zealand, USA? Why do Malaysians, for e.g. the self-anointed Islamic half white, half Indonesian brown Petra Kamarudin, gulf this enterprise to run divided (as Eli Wong also did) as well as hide in the White man's nation every time the local authorities go after them? One answer is which Malaysia as well as these countries share the usual birthright in an invasive legalist state, the sure political enlightenment alluded to earlier. The alternative illusive answer, although it is usually an presumptive one, comes from an additional novelist, Kazuo Ishiguro (above; The Remains of the Day, Nocturnes), who himself grew up as well as still lives in England. Says he:
"(T)here's the really difficult relationship in between Britain as well as its old colonies India, the Caribbean, Nigeria, as well as so on. And the prepared chosen in those countries have been taught in really English schools. They've grown up aspiring to the sure English indication of life"
An English indication of life? In an additional word, Anglophile. Other than Petra or Mahathir, cruise as well the good Christian Thomas Lee, the Tian ! Chuas (< em>Help! Police brutality. They took my lollipop, call CNN.), the Khoo Kay Kims (Either we let me duplicate the story of the Khoo clan or I'll call my mother.), as well as the editors during Malaysiakini as well as The Star (cakap orang putih). Don't they fit Ishiguro's description neatly?
*Postscript: Australia
What took them so long? India's Indians have been discovering belatedly which Australia (among others) is the fruit of the White man's land grab, historically cloaked in supremacist, condescending attitudes toward locals though today potential by the facade of tellurian rights as well as democracy. Of course, the white minions as well as their underlings in, for example, the Malaysiakini crowd, Manjit Bhatia (living off Australia), Steven Gan (Australian alumnus), et al, have next to zero to contend when Indians have been steadfastly set up as targets by White mobs (1,447 crimes against Indians in 2007-08 in Victoria alone). Saying anything betrays their English indication of life. However, with zero to lose, Outlook India has usually expelled the complete back-to-back cover job:
- The Dominant Australian Culture is the Racist Culture,
- Together in Fear as well as Trembling,
- Do You Speak Anglo-Saxon (Australian, in Outlook)?
Some relevant quotes:
No the single messes with the Chinese since fellow nationals run to his aid. The Indian runs to the Press.
Travelling upon the train sometime back, we was ashamed, as we could listen to the choicest Punjabi a! buses.
(The White government) tells them (Indians), we can come here though never to speak your denunciation or pursue your enlightenment the approach we want. It's the opposite banner underneath which we have been kept.
There is the enlightenment of injustice which comes from our schools, our preparation system. The dominant enlightenment in Australia is the extremist culture.
"Rakyat Hakim Negara" Hanya Retorik, Tidak Relevan Untuk Kes Liwat - Ahmad Maslan
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
No comments:
Post a Comment