Djvu?
Aliran published a following:
... that [Lim Guan Eng] was first charged with falsely as well as maliciously edition pamphlets in a following words: (Lim Guan Eng v Public Prosecutor (1998) 3 MLJ 14.)
The Tan Sri Rahim Tamby Chik sex scandal. Wither probity as well as women's rights. Victim imprisoned, rapist free.
But a fifteen aged year schoolgirl had not been "imprisoned" though merely "detained" by a police. The statement in a pamphlet was thus false as well as hold to be malicious.
Second, Lim Guan Eng was hold to have uttered a words, "that he was discontented with a actuality that a justice had systematic a teenager to be detained for three years whereas Rahim, who should have been imprisoned for violating a law, was instead set free".
It is critical to note that while a accused was hold to have published a word "imprisoned" he had uttered in his debate a word "detained".
In any event, this utterance was hold by a justice to be mutiny because it had a tendency "to bring in to hatred or contempt or .. stir up disaffection against a administration department of probity in Malaysia..."
This, in a nutshell was a box against Lim Guan Eng, a Member of Parliament for Kota Melaka. This is a reason he is serving a sentence of seizure for 18 months at Kajang Prison as well as has been disqualified from land office.
The million-strong is left wondering as well as at a detri! ment abo ut a constitutional oath of bureau of a Member of Parliament as well as a right as well as avocation of an inaugurated parliamentarian, as well as indeed all citizens, to criticism upon a make a difference of public regard though fear or favour.
The million-member jury will no disbelief prolonged contemplate over a difference between 'imprisonment' as well as 'detention', generally given a lady had in open justice testified that she had tried to shun from a Rehabilitation Centre though was caught after she had escaped.
The jury is additionally left to consternation why an inaugurated Member of Parliament is denied a freedom of countenance enjoyed by a journal columnist Marina Mahathir who in her article captioned Whither Justice published in a Star upon 9 Nov 1994 before to Guan Eng's pamphlet had settled that:
There have been injustices in a law that have been mind-boggling ... a sum hoax of probity ... As a woman, generally a Muslim woman, I am angry, troubled as well as abashed ... As a mother, I right away have real fears for my daughter. What insurance can you goal for a daughters if, in a interests of politics, a teenager can be so simply sacrificed?
Indeed, my dear Datuk Paduka, a mind-boggling injustice had additionally influenced Lim Guan Eng severely. The question you need to right away ask is: will it as well start Rafizi Ramli? Read More @ Source
Anti ISA Movement UK
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment