Well, Musa Hassan might repudiate this allegation, which he did. ButMalaysia Todayhas constructed 9 witnesses (more than a 4 required for a explain of illicit love affair as stipulated in a section ofThe Lightin a Quran) which Musa Hassan is guilty as alleged. And th! e oaths of these 9 people (seven military officers as well as dual black market figures) were in a form of Affidavits or Statutory Declarations. That equates to these 9 people have sworn which a ex-IGP Musa Hassan is guilty.
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
There have been many sorts of laws. We have criminal laws, civil laws, traffic laws, stipulate laws, promissory note laws, general laws, divorce laws, inheritance laws, as well as whatnot. And within these laws, during slightest as distant as Malaysia is concerned, areShariahlaws, additionally well known as Islamic laws.
Shariahlaws have been damaged down intoQisas, Diyya, Tazir, as well as a many controversial of all,Hudud. MostShariahlaws have been already implemented in Malaysia saveHudud.Currently, usual laws overrideHududlaws.
Hudud, again, is damaged down in to 6 or 7 (depending upon which sect of Islam is doing a interpreting) critical crimes which include rebellion, robbery, theft, celebration alcohol, illicit passionate intercourse, apostasy/blasphemy, and, strangely enough, fake indictment of adultery.
Now, amongst this list of critical crimes includes a crime of creation a fake explain of illicit love affair opposite someone. This is considered a critical crime in Islam as well as some scholars even contend which a fake explain opposite someone is ! some-mor e critical than attempted murder (taking someone's life).
In fact, there is a whole section in a Quran to residence this matter,Surah An-Nur(chapter 24), which goes as follows:
[Noor 24:4] And those who credit chaste women as well as do not move 4 witnesses to attest - retaliate them with eighty lashes as well as do not ever accept their testimony; as well as it is they who have been a wicked.
[Noor 24:5] Except those who grieve after this as well as reform themselves; so indeed Allah is Oft Forgiving, Most Merciful.
[Noor 24:6] And those who credit their wives as well as do not have witnesses except their own statements for such a sworn statement is which he bear a sworn statement 4 times by a name of Allah which he is truthful.
[Noor 24:7] And a fifth time, which a curse of Allah be upon him if he is a liar.
[Noor 24:8] And a punishment shall be averted from a lady if she bears a sworn statement 4 times by a name of Allah, which a male is a liar.
[Noor 24:9] And a fifth time, which a wrath of Allah be upon her if a male is truthful.
In short: if we credit a lady (or your wife) of adultery, have certain we have 4 witnesses. If we do not have 4 witnesses afterwards swear 5 times which a explain is true. And if a lady wants to urge herself opposite this allegation, afterwards she too can furnish 4 witnesses or else swear 5 times which a explain is false. And if she does not have 4 witnesses though instead swears 5 times which she is trusting afterwards she is giveaway of a explain as well as cannot be punished.
This equates to both a prosecution as well as a indicted do not have 4 witnesses to back up his/her explain as well as denial. Hence they both have to swear 5 times which they have been telling a law as well as a rest is left to God. Clearly, a single of a dual contingency be lying. However, since both have sworn! 5 times which they have been telling a truth, usually God will know who is a liar as well as it is left to God to retaliate a liar.
That is how simple it is. we have an explain afterwards we possibly furnish 4 witnesses or else swear 5 times. The chairman we am creation a explain opposite can additionally put up a counterclaim by producing 4 witnesses to back up which rejection or else additionally swear fives times.
Then a make a difference ends there as well as afterward it is in a hands of God.
we know some idiots (non-Muslims in particular) argue which Islamic laws have been foolish since we need 4 witnesses to infer rape. These have been statements done by undeveloped people who consider they understand Islamic laws though actually know nothing. They have been usually sanctimonious they have been learned. Rape as well as allegations of illicit love affair have been dual different matters.
Anyway, a indicate is, allegations have been treated with colour with colour as critical matters, in sold allegations of adultery, which comes underneath a critical crimes category ofHudud. That is how critical this make a difference is treated. And a actuality which there is a whole section in a Quran (chapterAn-NurorThe Light) usually reinforces a seriousness of this make a difference in a eyes of Islam.
Okay, which is as distant as a explain of illicit love affair is concerned. What about other sorts of allegations? Well,An-Nurjust deals with allegations by a male opposite a lady (or a husband opposite a wife) per adultery. And in a eventuality there have been no witnesses though is usually a single person's word opposite another, afterwards we solve a 'stalemate' by swearing fives times as well as afterwards leave a make a difference to God to solve.
Now, what about other sorts of allegations other than adultery? How do we hoop these? For example, a ex-IGP Musa Hassan (plus a AGC as well as MACC) denies a explai! n opposi te him which he is linked to or is a boss of a Chinese black market crime syndicate which controls drugs, prostitution, gambling, loan sharking, etc.
Well, Musa Hassan might repudiate this allegation, which he did. ButMalaysia Todayhas constructed 9 witnesses (more than a 4 required for a explain of illicit love affair as stipulated in a section ofThe Lightin a Quran) which Musa Hassan is guilty as alleged. And a oaths of these 9 people (seven military officers as well as dual black market figures) were in a form of Affidavits or Statutory Declarations. That equates to these 9 people have sworn which a ex-IGP Musa Hassan is guilty.
Musa Hassan has pronounced he is not guilty. SinceMalaysia Todayhas constructed 9 witnesses who have sworn an promise which he is guilty, can Musa Hassan afterwards swear fives times in a name of Allah which he is not guilty? we doubt he would brave do this, which should be a public promise sworn in front of witnesses as well as in a name of Allah.
This is a difficulty with Malaysia. Malaysians suffer from a sickness called rejection syndrome. They usually deny, deny, repudiate at your convenience an explain is done opposite them. But it is their word opposite a accuser. How can their rejection be accepted as loyal when it is usually a rejection not corroborated by an promise or witnesses?
Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad put it really aptly when he said: no a single will confess which he or she is guilty. Of course a guilty chairman will repudiate guilt. Who is starting to confess guilt?
we suspect a observant which a prisons have been full of trusting people is really true. No a single in jail will confess guilt. Everyone in jail claims which he or she is innocent. It would be really difficult to find even 1% of those in jail who will confess to their crimes. How in heaven's name did a justice find all these trusting people guilty is over me. Only 1% of people in jail have been guilty if we go by t! heir con fessions.
Can we take your pleadings of ignorance as well as your rejection of a crime as explanation which we have been innocent? The answer is possibly 'yes' or 'no'. If 'yes', afterwards we contingency assume which Najib Tun Razak is innocent, Anwar Ibrahim is innocent, Dr Mahathir is innocent, Daim Zainudduin is innocent, Ling Liong Sik is innocent, Shahrizat Jalil is innocent, Rosmah Mansor is innocent, Razak Baginda is innocent, a dual military officers have been innocent, a AG is innocent, a ex-IGP is innocent, Khalid Ibrahim is innocent, a PKR lawyers have been innocent, a Malaysian Bar Council is innocent, Azmin Ali is innocent, Rafidah Aziz is innocent, Ibrahim Ali is innocent, Tajuddin Ramli is innocent, a Perak supervision is innocent, a Selangor supervision is innocent, as well as so upon as well as so forth.
You see: we can't request double standards here. Everyone as well as some-more mentioned on top of have all pleaded innocence. None of them have certified guilt. So, if their explain of ignorance is explanation sufficient of their innocence, afterwards a make a difference ends there. They have been all innocent.
None have offered evidence of their innocence. None have constructed 4 witnesses to support their explain of innocence. And none have sworn 5 times in a name of Allah which they have been trusting of all allegations done opposite them.
If mere denials have been not valid as well as can't be accepted, afterwards no make a difference either we have been pro-government or pro-opposition, we have been deemed guilty of a allegations opposite you. That would be how it works. However, if mere denials have been great sufficient as well as as a result we have been deemed trusting by virtue of your denial, afterwards everyone indicted of crimes would be deemed innocent.
So what is it starting to be? All innocent? Or all guilty? Or usually those who have been pro-government have been guilty whilst those who have been pro-oppositio! n have b een innocent?
That's not what a Quran said.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment