How do you 'give' the oil producing states oil kingship for something which already belongs to them in the initial place?
COMMENT
By Raja Petra Kamarudin Give or take, give as well as take, they have been both four minute words, only as Umno is (pun intended). Nevertheless, you can design Umno to be confused about when to make use of the word "give" as well as when to make use of "take". However, Pakatan Rakyat too?
As Julius Caesar said, "Et tu Brute?"
you am articulate about the 5% oil kingship "given" to Sabah as well as Sarawak (and, of course, to Terengganu, as well as to all the other states as well: in the event which they as well have oil as well as gas).
Yes, both Barisan Nasional as well as Pakatan Rakyat have been currently deliberating how most kingship should be "given" to those states which have oil as well as gas.
How do you "give" them something which already belongs to them in the initial place? Should not the word you make use of be "take"? We should instead be deliberating how most you should "take" from them, not how most you should "give" them.
Let me explain the history of this complete thing.
The oil as well as gas already belongs to the states. This is what the Malaysia Agreement as well as the earlier Federation Agreement was all about. And, in which agreement, it was agreed which all healthy resources would be the skill of the states.
No doubt, the little things such as defence, security, unfamiliar policy, etc., were federalised. But sacrament as well as healthy resources have been ostensible to be the prerogative as well as skill of the states.
Water, ti! mber, la nd, sand, minerals, etc., all go to the states. As do oil as well as gas. These have been what you call healthy resources. Hence they go 100% to the states, not 5% or 20% or 50% or whatever.
Now, Umno is, of course, misleading us. They have been articulate as if all healthy resources, solely oil as well as gas, go to the states as well as which oil as well as gas go to the sovereign government. That is not true. And to suggest differently is the violation of the Malaysia Agreement.
And you would design better from the opposition. Why is the antithesis sounding similar to Barisan Nasional as well as articulate about how most oil kingship to "give" to the states?
Discovery of oil
Oil was initial rumoured to have been discovered in Terengganu even prior to 1972, during the time which Nik Hassan Wan Abdul Rahman was the Menteri Besar of Terengganu as well as Tun Abdul Razak Hussein the Prime Minister of Malaysia. And you pronounced rumoured since the discovery of oil was never officially voiced though was something which was being whispered in the corridors of power.
Why the hush-hush? Well, since the supervision had to initial sort out the little "loose ends" prior to announcing the discovery of oil.
So they did not want anyone to know about it until the sovereign supervision could safeguard which the oil was "transferred" to the sovereign government. If not, 100% of the oil income would go to the state of Terengganu.
In the meantime, they personally sole the oil to unfamiliar buyers. The oil was eliminated from the oil rigs to the ships in the middle of the sea as well as was exported. Only the little people knew about it, the Petronas officers being the little of those people.
Lim Kit Siang came to find out about this secret agreement as well as there was the paint as well as cry when he revealed which the oil was being stolen from Terengganu. It seems the Deep Throat in Petronas h! ad told him about it. Exxon, in collaboration with Petronas, were fingered as the chief conspirators.
A crisis was about to explode. There were rumours which all the documents in the Exxon office in Kuala Lumpur unexpected left as well as reappeared in Singapore the following day.
Then, suddenly, the whole thing mysteriously died down as well as zero some-more was pronounced about the matter. No denial or rebuttal was ever issued.
Soon after that, the Menteri Besar went in to dispute with the Sultan as well as was forced to resign. He was also exiled from Terengganu as well as was not allowed to ever set foot upon Terengganu dirt again as prolonged as the Sultan was still alive. He never returned to Terengganu until the Sultan died.
The moving impulse in which complete episode was when the Sultan's brother stormed the Menteri Besar's office as well as forked the gun at the Menteri Besar's head. The Sultan's brother as well was exiled to Pahang as well as only returned to Terengganu to attend the Sultan's funeral.
The BN oil plan
Meanwhile, Tun Razak came out with the devise upon how to bring PAS in to the sovereign government. PAS had to be neutralised if the sovereign supervision wanted to squeeze Terengganu's oil.
The idea to form Barisan Nasional was mooted as well as all the antithesis parties such as PAS, PPP, Gerakan, etc., were invited to join Barisan Nasional.
In 1973, BN was launched as well as PAS became part of the sovereign government. In 1974, the brand new statute coalition in Parliament (where all the antithesis parties solely DAP were right away members of) passed the Petroleum Development Act as well as the oil as well as gas were eliminated from the states to the sovereign government, definition Petronas.
To keep the states quiet, they were given 5% as the token "oil royalty".
This was similar to the whites receiving divided the Native American la! nds (the n called Red Indians) by giving them worthless beads as payment.
Now, if the sovereign supervision had energy over oil as well as gas, why the need to pass the Petroleum Development Act in Parliament? Just take it! But they couldn't only take it. Oil as well as gas have been the skill of the states. So they needed to pass an Act of Parliament to legalize the illegal takeover of state property.
There was, of course, the little insurgency to this move, in particular from Sabah. But all insurgency was silenced when the dissenters died in the mysterious plane pile-up which has never been scrupulously explained until today.
Pakatan should stop articulate about how most oil kingship to "give" the states as well as either it should be increasing from the stream 5% to 20% or 50% or whatever. That is BN type of talk.
Correcting the injustice
The sovereign supervision is essentially receiving what belongs to the states. Therefore, you should be articulate about how most you should take: either 95% similar to now, or either you revoke what you take down to 80% or 50%.
If you go by the suggestion of the Federation Agreement, then you should take nothing. You should return 100% to the states. The most you can do is to levy the tax, similar to the joist trade tax, palm oil tax, etc. That is all the sovereign supervision can earn. Even if the taxation is 35% or 45%, never mind. But it has to be taxation upon the distinction of the sales or the form of trade taxation or sales tax, either you make the distinction upon the sale or not.
We regularly speak about Rule of Law as well as not Rule by Law. The Petroleum Development Act is the classic example of Rule by Law. They passed the law to legalize something illegal: meaning, nationalising state property.
We contingency right away scold this injustice as well as call the scoop the spade. The sovereign supervision has been robbing the states of thei! r oil fo r the last 40 years as well as has been giving them the small 5% of the proceeds when it should be 100%. That is the reality of the situation.
Lim Kit Siang of DAP knows about this. He was the a single who revealed what was starting upon even prior to most people knew which oil was being extracted from Terengganu.
And Tun Salleh Abas of PAS also knows about this. He was the "architect" who drafted the Petroleum Development Act.
So no some-more speak about how most to give the states. We contingency right away speak about what you have been receiving from the states.
Raja Petra Kamarudin is the renouned blogger formed in Manchester, UK.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment