A VERY GOOD PIECE OF MATERIAL THAT WILL ENLIGHTEN MALAYSIANS as great as it will have us to consider how critical a person's firmness is in ONES LIFE. Read, request as great as use it to have a happy life.
* This is a debate delivered by Tun Hamid Mohamad, former Chief Justice of Malaysia during a 1st UNITEN Premier Lecture on3rd February 2012
I thank UNITEN as great as a Institut Integriti Malaysia for giving me a apply oneself of delivering a initial harangue of this series. we am some-more honored by a fact which this harangue is upon firmness which makes me reason which we contingency have a small integrity, during slightest enough to broach this lecture, supposing which a invitation is not a inapplicable designation !
As we am not an academician, we have motionless to verbalise about what we have seen, listened as great as gifted via my life, vis-a-vis integrity. So, if we were to ask me how prolonged we took to hope for this lecture, my answer is "Sixty 9 years as great as ten months!"
I hope we will bear with me for a while, whilst we narrate a story of this male whom we am receiving as an example.
At a tighten of a nineteenth century, a baby was innate in Permatang Tinggi Bakar Bata, Kepala Batas, Province Wellesley. He grew up in a village, attended a pondok propagandize in Kedah, afterwards in Kelantan as great as after outlayed a couple of years in Makkah where he attended classes during Masjid al-Haram.
He returned home, tied together a girl from a same village, worked as a rice planter. He taught a Qu'ran upon a voluntary basement twice a day to a young kids in a village, besides being a Imam of ! a mosque in a area.
In 1950s there was no propagandize in Bumbung Lima. He as great as a people in a area motionless to build a school. They picked up income after each harvesting season which was entrusted to him for safekeeping. They went in to a nearby timberland to cut down trees as great as bamboo and, in a gotong royong tradition, built a three-classroom propagandize done of attap roof tiles as great as woven bamboo walls as great as windows. The Government supposing a teachers as great as a young kids in a nearby villages went to school.
The mosque with woven bamboo walls, was elderly as great as rotting. He instituted a account to reconstruct it, collecting RM15 (if we am not mistaken) from any family after each harvesting season. He kept a income in protected custody, bundled in an elderly square of cloth as great as well known to a mom as great as young kids as duit Masjid as great as no a single would touch it. During which period, he paid for an elderly Austin 8, a initial automobile in a village. Fearing which people might consider which he had dissipated a duit Masjid to buy a car, upon a following Friday, he carried a gold of income to a mosque. Before a request started, he placed a gold upon a building of a verandah of a mosque (called balai lintang since it lies horizontal to a main building) as great as voiced to those present. "Those of we who consider which we paid for a automobile with a "mosque money", come as great as equate it." There was a finish silence. The mosque was built as great as completed, wholly from a income picked up from a villagers as great as their sweat.
There was an Imam Muda, a lebai from Kedah, tied together to his niece. There was a rumor which he used to go as great as pick up income from a taukeh of a emporium where gambling was starting on. A date was bound for a "hearing" and, as usual, upon Friday. Our theme challenged those who saw a situa! tion to come brazen as great as repeat their allegation. Two organisation came brazen as great as swore which they were in a emporium as great as they saw a Imam Muda came as great as took income from a taukeh. The Imam Muda was relieved of his position. There was no Majlis Agama Islam yet during which time.
There was an Indian male by a name of Banggaru living usually outward a village. He had eleven young young kids as great as his mom had died of childbirth. Their mud residence was flooded. He invited Banggaru as great as his young kids to live temporarily underneath his Malay-type kampung residence built upon stilts. They lived there until a flood subsided. About thirty years later, a automobile came to a subject's house. There were 3 Indian organisation in a car. The dual younger organisation carried an elderly as great as delicate man, sitting upon a behind chair of a automobile in to a subject's house, which was a new a single yet upon a same mark as a elderly one. The elderly as great as delicate Indian male was no alternative than Banggaru. He longed for to meet "Haji" (that was how he called a subject) for a final time prior to he died as great as to thank "Haji" for all his help. Banggaru died shortly after that. He knew how to contend "thank you".
There were dual Chinese families living usually outward a village. They regularly quarreled with any alternative as great as would run to "Haji's" residence to protest about a other. Needless to say, a theme would suggest them to live as great neighbors, after all there were usually dual of them there.
Another Chinese man. a finish outsider, came to open a bicycle emporium in a nearby Bumbung Lima. He had no money. He went to see a theme to steal a couple of hundred Ringgit who gave him a income as great as thoughts you, particularly yet seductiveness as seductiveness is riba'. The Chinese mans commercial operation grew as great as he v! entured in to alternative businesses prior to he died. His young kids inherited his businesses as great as have been great off right divided yet we disbelief possibly they know a story.
One day, a elderly mom of a Penghulu came to his residence crying: her son had chased her out of a house. More than a decade later, a Penghulu himself, right divided retired, came to him complaining which he had been chased out of a same residence by his son. Of course, a theme reminded a Penghulu of a progressing incident.
He was already unequivocally elderly afterwards yet he could still cycle. Someone informed him of a small people gambling in a bushes nearby a village. He cycled there as great as upon observant him coming they all fled. It was not a box of fright yet abashed to be seen by him gambling.
He died during a age of about 100, unfortunately we do not know his date of birth. Even then, he died in style. He had complained of feeling feverish. He longed for to take his ablution, which he did. He asked for a purify sarong as great as baju Melayu, He ready to go up for prayer, placed a request mat facing Ka'abah as great as pronounced "Soon a Imam will come". Not perceptive what he unequivocally meant, his son replied, "No, it is still too early for Maghrib", He collapsed, ready to go for request as great as whilst watchful for it, finish with ablution. Then a young kids accepted what he meant by "Soon a Imam will come". That night, 3 generations of his students kept watchful as great as shouted a Qur'an for him. The youths in a encampment insisted which they longed for to lift his physique to a cemetery about dual miles divided instead of being ecstatic by van.
Why do people go to him for advice, for allotment of disputes as great as for all kinds of things? Why do people not instruct to be seen by him we do something wrong? The answer is which they have a lo! t of app ly oneself for him. Why do they apply oneself him? Simply, it is since of his integrity.
Who is which man? Today, sixteen years after his death, UNITEN as great as Institut Integriti Malaysia, not knowing a story, invite his youngest son to broach this lecture. Yes, which male is my father, Haji Mohamad Bin Haji Abdullah or well known as "'Pak Su' or 'Pak Cik' Haji Ahmad", depending possibly we have been from a consanguine or motherly side. If we deserve this invitation, we owe it to him as great as we work during this harangue to him. May Allah bless his soul. What can we sense from him per "integrity"?
First, he did not even know a word "integrity" possibly in Malay or English, what some-more disproportion similar to "transparency", keutuhan as great as so on. But he knew what was right as great as what was wrong as great as he regularly chose to do what was right. we surmise that, many probably, he knew such Qur'anic disproportion similar to haq as great as batil, ma'aruf as great as munkar which could have shabby him greatly, as they did upon me. My indicate is, we might live a reason up full of firmness yet realizing it yet by we do what we know is right as great as avoiding what we know is wrong.
Second, we reason he knew a word jujur as great as ikhlas but, in all my life, we did not listen to him use those disproportion even once. But what he did not preach by words, he, perhaps yet realizing it, was preaching by examples. There is zero some-more effective than preaching by example. As far as we have review which was what Prophet Muhammad s.a.w. did. Due to his glorious examples as great as some-more so being a Prophet, a sahabah similar to Abu Hurairah would follow him, celebrated each movement he done as great as each word he said, in answer to questions or otherwise, as great as available them faithfully. All those examples became traditions as great as followed all over a! univers e for a single as great as a half millennium now. That is a energy of care by examples, great examples.
Why was "Kepimpinan Melalui Teladan" lost almost as shortly as it was launched? Because a great examples were not forthcoming. As a result, unequivocally couple of people, took it seriously as great as shortly it became not pertinent as great as was forgotten.
Even Madonna, a "material girl", knows how to conclude firmness when she speaks about her father:
"My father was unequivocally strong, we do not determine with a lot of a ways he brought me up. we do not determine with a lot of his values, yet he did have a lot of integrity, as great as if he told us not to do something, he didn't do it either."i
Now, listen to this:
"O we who have believed, since do we contend what we do not do?
Great is loathing in a sight of Allah which we contend what we do not do." Al-Saff (61): 2 as great as 3. (Sahih International)
I do not consider anyone would suggest which Madonna and/or her father had review those dual verses!
Third, firmness has to be earned a tough approach via a life. You might have outlayed years or decades we do a right thing as great as accumulating your integrity, yet a single misstep, a single mistake, a single misdeed inspiring your probity or morality, a whole of what we have accumulated, is wiped out. Once we remove it, it is even some-more formidable to accumulate it again.
Fourth, a person's educational gift is utterly not pertinent for a chairman to attain firmness even yet it helps to understand it. But understanding firmness does not have a single a chairman of integrity. A chairman might be an intellectual yet he might be ! intellec tually dishonest or he might be dishonest with his lassie or driver both of which, trivial as they appear, would put a peck upon his integrity. You will be astounded which what appears to be trivial might have a big disastrous effect upon a person's integrity.
On a alternative hand, a chairman might not be means to conclude integrity. He might not be means to give harangue upon it. With a fitrah which Allah has since us, with right upbringing, right surrounding, a chairman would know, what is right as great as what is wrong. True enough which right as great as wrong could be subjective, severely shabby by your religion, culture, multitude as great as law. Yet, when it comes to honesty, a core part for integrity, we do not consider there is any room for a disproportion of opinion. So, miss of firmness is not due to ignorance. You know firmness yet a subject is: do we have it? Whether we have it or not depends upon you, upon what we do via your life. In alternative words, it boils down to a character. But, we have been all human. Everyone has moments of debility as great as indiscretion. However, what makes a disproportion is how critical as great as how often. When such moments of debility as great as misdeed spin a norm rsther than than a exception, what some-more when those "wrongs" have spin "normal", afterwards there is something unequivocally unequivocally wrong with a person.
Fifth, a person's in front of is not pertinent too. He might reason a unequivocally high, critical as great as absolute position. If he has no integrity, a unequivocally same people who salute him, bow to him, hail him as great as try to please him, might not have any apply oneself for him low in their hearts. A great indicator is what people contend behind your behind or how a same people provide we after we retire: whether, observant we walking during a supermarket, people whom we do not even recollect or commend would walk up to you, hail you, ! introduc e themselves, ask how have been we as great as instruct we great or, even those we commend usually spin away. That is since we used to contend which a genuine assessment of a career whilst we have been still alive is when we retire. The final a single is when we die.
Sixth, firmness requires no advertisement if we have it, conjunction can we censor it if we do not have it. Actually, a person's probity can be seen upon his face. we am sure we have gifted listening to a orator whose smoothness was impeccable, who was unequivocally fluent as great as witty as great as who spoke yet text. You were mesmerized by him but, when he stopped as great as a impulse a sound of clapping died down, we wondered possibly he meant what he said. On a alternative hand, we would have gifted listening to an additional person, who review his debate with a small difficulty yet even as he spoke, to allude to Allah yarham Tun Mohamed Suffian, "you could see his probity shining by his forehead." ii
Out of curiosity, we attempted to check what alternative people have pronounced or combined about integrity, focusing upon a word "integrity" itself in propinquity to "individual integrity" as opposite "organizational integrity". we find a results interesting. Let us run by a couple of of them.
"A chairman is not since integrity. It results from a relentless bureau of probity during all times." - Unknown.
"Integrity is what we do, what we contend as great as what we contend we do." - Don Galor
"Integrity is a essence of all successful." - Richard Buckminster Fulleriii.
"Integrity is we do a right thing, even if nobody is watching." - Anonymous.
"Have a courage to contend no. Have a courage to face a truth. Do a right thing since it is right. These have be! en a sor cery keys to living your reason up with integrity." - William Clement Stoneiv.
"Integrity is revelation myself a truth. And probity is revelation a law to alternative people." - Spencer Johnson.v
Surprisingly, they seem to be articulate about a same thing.
I have been articulate about firmness during particular level. To me which is where it begins, possibly we have been looking during individual, group, multitude or classification level. Of course, during group, multitude as great as organizational levels, alternative additional factors come in to play.
Let us take a glance during a multitude level. First, let us take a couple of random samples focusing upon honesty, a pass part to integrity.
A Professor of Polish origin who taught during a National University of Singapore, told me whenever he crossed a causeway to Johor Bahru he would take a taxi driven by a male wearing a white cap since he found him some-more honest.
A Professor from a United States left his coupler with his purse as great as pass in it in a sight in Japan. He rang up a series upon a ticket. He was told to go as great as pick up it during a next station. He found all intact.
A Captain of an international merchant ship told me which a worst port in a universe in conditions of intrigue is a port in a primarily Muslim republic in a Middle East.
Traveling in Switzerland we saw farmers fixation a list upon a side of a highway with vegetables for sale. The vegetables had been weighed as great as any gold had a cost tab upon it. There was a box upon a list for we to put income into. If we have no shift we might open a box as great as take your change. Mind you, there was no a single around. (I told a friend about it. H! e pronou nced which if we were to do it here, even a list would be gone!)
A friend of mine told me of blatant intrigue during a temple which he went for pilgrimage to.
In 1981, we was transferred to a State as a State Legal Advisor. A couple of days prior to a Aidil Firti, we went to a mosque to compensate my fitrah. The Bilal, an amil was there. He asked me possibly we had "registered". we replied "No. we have usually come to live here". we paid him a compulsory amount. He put it in his pocket. we waited. Then he said, "Dah selesai". we asked "What about a receipt?" He replied, "No need since we have not registered."
If we go to Makkah we will find which a impulse a azan is heard, emporium keepers would usually leave their sell as great as conduct for a mosque. You have been tender by it. But, when we instruct to buy something, afterwards we comprehend which we dont even know a reasonable cost for a particular item. You have been during a forgiveness of a shopkeeper. He might allude to whatever cost he likes, infrequently receiving advantage of a stupidity as great as a naivety of a customer. It is up to a patron to bargain. To him it is legal, Strictly from a fiqhi perspective it might be legal, yet is it honest? Is which what a Shari'ah is all about? To me, Shari'ah is not usually law. It has a soul. The essence is iman as great as probity is an integral part of it.
A couple of years ago, we went in to a sports emporium in The Hague, Netherlands. we favourite a pair of boots with a tab of 25% bonus upon it as great as we told a emporium attendant about it. He went to fetch a alternative side of a shoe as great as came behind to me. He pointed to a small hole upon a side of a shoe."You see a hole here. We usually have this pair, we cannot sell we for 25% discount, If we instruct this pair, I'll give we 50% discount. Or, we can go to a alternative ben! d as gre at as get a new pair" (at 25% discount, of course.)
The Makkah as great as a The Hague knowledge have been unequivocally engaging really. The Hague emporium partner was essentially practising a Shari'ah element which it is obligatory for a seller to divulge a defects in a goods he is selling, yet knowing which which is a Shari'ah requirement. On a alternative hand, a shopkeeper in Makkah was practising a usual law element of premonition emptor (buyers beware) yet knowing it either. Between a dual practices, which is some-more Islamic?
Perhaps, it is these kinds of things which done Mohammed Abduhvi to remark after his outing to Europe: "I saw Islam yet Muslims". we do not know possibly behind in Egypt afterwards he saw Muslims as great as Islam or Muslims yet Islam.
Looking during these samples, my initial comment is which we can find both probity as great as duplicity everywhere, usually some-more here or reduction there. Neither can we indicate to a single particular cause as a reason since a single organisation of people possibly in a same republic or in opposite countries have been some-more honest than a other. You cannot contend it is religion, for example, since we will find which people in developing countries who crop up to be unequivocally religious, during slightest ritually as great as appearance-wise, have been reduction honest than a people in developed countries, a majority of whom care unequivocally little, if during all, about religion. The examples we gave progressing would bear sworn make a difference to this statement.
We additionally cannot generalize which people belonging to a particular sacrament is some-more honest than a other. We find which people belonging to a same sacrament in a single republic is some-more honest as great as reduction corrupt than in an additional country. we consider a answer lies in a multiple ! of facto rs. Including, religion, moral, ethic, culture, education, upbringing, spin of economy, opportunity (in a box of corruption), fervour as great as foe (especially in a commercial operation world) as great as law as great as order.
Besides these factors, a function of members of organizations, e.g. in Government departments as great as companies, we think, rely unequivocally most upon a care as great as a philosophy of a organization. The story of a professor who left his coupler upon a sight in Japan, a story of a emporium partner in The Hague, a story of a shopkeeper in Makkah have been examples of a philosophy of a organization.
At national level, some-more so in a quarrel opposite corruption, there contingency be domestic will: a firmness to quarrel crime as great as a e.g. of not being concerned in it.
Singapore has been utterly successful in this. Admittedly, politics in Singapore is some-more true forward. There is no opposition, really. There, a domestic celebration does not need big capital to quarrel an election. On a alternative hand, there is a utterly opposite choosing enlightenment here. Sadly, which has spin a Malaysian culture. My be concerned is which we have reached a theatre where electorate have been "offering their votes for sale" to a highest bidder quite for short-term personal gains as great as a domestic parties have no choice yet to keep bidding, disregarding a goods upon a republic as great as a nation, what some-more if a politicians have stopped thinking over 5 years! Once we was in The Hague upon a ubiquitous choosing day. we would not know which it was an choosing day had we not been told about it: there was not a single poster along a road. Still there was an election.
Whatever it is, crime is not regularly in a form of domestic donations. It is some-more personal as great as direct.
When we discuss "corporate leaders", we am referring to all a "givers". Very often, people lend towards to concentration usually upon a open sector whilst a in isolation sector escapes attention: Government, open servants, Judges as great as others contingency be clean; companies as great as businessmen need not be purify as they have been usually to be judged by how most distinction they make. That enlightenment has to change.
When we discuss "politicians", we mean all politicians, possibly they have been during a impulse using a supervision or in a opposition. For those in power, a perspective which they have been an difference is really not starting to help. In a quarrel opposite corruption, no a single is special as great as no a single is an exception. For those in a opposition, a perspective which currently is your spin as great as tomorrow will be a spin is not starting to assistance either.
Unfortunately, even in combating corruption, domestic seductiveness still rules. we was Chairman of a Advisory Council of a Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) until we resigned since of my prolonged hospitalization. During a dual years which we was Chairman, we saw a frustrations of a officers who were discharging their duties diligently as great as honestly. They should get a full support from everyone since a quarrel for crime is a usual belligerent for all. Instead, a small groups, take side according to their vested interests, in a name of a people, justice, fairness, equality, leisure of speech, tellurian rights, democracy as great as so on. They screamed for movement to be taken opposite their opponents. But, when their members were investigated, they purported which they were perse! cuted. W hen their competition was arrested, charged, attempted as great as convicted, there was a finish silence from them. When a single of their organisation fell from a bureau of a MACC as great as diedvii, they true divided blamed a MACC for it. The NGOs too joined in. When an inquisition was held, it was criticized forgetting which such inquests were routinely hold in such cases since a British introduced a Criminal Procedure Code in this country. While a inquisition was starting on, demonstrations were held, in effect perfectionist which preference be done a approach they instruct it to be. That inquisition took 51 operative days over a duration of 18 months.viii It was followed by a Commission of Inquiry of 5 members which took an additional 51 operative days of open hearing.ix
Everybody sympathizes with a deceased as great as his family. Nobody wants such an situation to happen. But, we should be fair to all. Let a process of a law take a own course, first, during least. Independence of a judiciary does not usually mean non-interference by a Executive. What relates to a Executive similarly relates to everybody.
In a unequivocally similar situation involving a Senior Customs Officerx, which happened about dual years later, usually an inquisition was held. It proceeded sensitively as great as uniformly as great as it took usually fifteen operative days over a duration of 3 months.xi There was no Commission of Inquiry. There were no demonstrations as great as even a NGOs which were so vocal in a initial box were particularly still in a second case. How do we explain that?
I am additionally a member of a Judicial Appointments Commission. (Let me have it clear which we observant all these in my personal capacity). We have been we do a most appropriate to recommend a right candidates for appointment as Judges as great as additionally for promotions. We have been additionally trying to rest! ore a fi rmness of a Judiciary which was during a lowest following a V. K. Lingam video clip incident. we brave contend which a firmness of a Judiciary has improved significantly in a final 4 years. Besides, a Courts have succeeded to revoke a backlog as great as to revoke a duration taken for a ordering of cases to such an border which even a World Bank has since a favorable report about it.
But, look during a recent box involving an antithesis domestic leaderxii. (I am not observant possibly a visualisation is right or wrong. we am usually articulate about a proceedings.) His conference took 88 operative days over a duration of 2 years as great as 10 months. During a conference he done seventeen applications as great as 8 appeals. Amongst his applications, 3 were to disqualify a Judgexiii upon a belligerent of disposition which, in reality, was severe his integrity. We additionally review reports of attempts to disprove a Judiciary as great as to subject a autonomy of a Judiciary not usually domestically yet additionally internationally. There was a debate to release him even prior to a visualisation was given.
However, when a visualisation turned out to be in his favor, he pronounced which he was clear since a Government (I repeat, a Government) was worried about a disastrous picture abroad if he were convictedxiv. Is which not equating a Court with a Executive? Is which not an claim or an deduction which a Judge took instruction from a Executive to arrive during his preference or which a Executive commanded a preference to him? Or, to use a "popular terminology", is which not an claim or deduction which there was a "conspiracy" between a Government (i.e. Executive) as great as a Judge (i.e. Judiciary) to acquit him? By which statement, is a autonomy as great as a firmness of a Judge, a justice as great as a Judiciary not brought in to contempt? (It is engaging to note which upon a following day, his own warn denied ("sangkal") a! reason since by his client for his exculpation as great as went upon to contend which a visualisation was based upon justification as great as which a Government had zero to do with it.)xv
During a same period, a former Menteri Besarxvi was charged for corruption. The conference went upon uniformly as great as quietly. It usually took 19 operative days over a duration of a single year.xvii Even when he was convicted, he did not criticize a Judge or a Judiciary. Similarly, Datuk Haji Harun Bin Haji Idrisxviii, Haji Abdul Ghani Bin Ishakxix, Dato Waad Bin Mansorxx, Datuk Haji Zulkifli Bin Datuk Abdul Hamidxxi, Datuk Sahar Arpanxxii, Dato Haji Mohamd Muslimxxiii, Dato Mokhtar Hashimxxiv or, for which matter, Tun Dr. Ling Leong Sikxxv as great as Dato Chan Kong Choyxxvi, whose trials have been still pending, all fought or have been fighting their particular cases upon merits, not by aggressive a Judges as great as a Judiciary.
I sympathize with those Judges as great as supervision officers. we know a great majority of them have been discharging their duties diligently as great as honestly, yet even looking during a clock. However, they should not despondency because, eventually, law will prevail as great as probity will supersede all. Believe me. we am speaking from experience.
Actually, upon each tellurian being, upon each a single of us, there is a cost tag, an firmness cost tag, yet phonetic as great as not displayed, is well known as great as concluded to by all. Behind a praises, a handshakes as great as a smiles which people give us, low inside their hearts, it is which invisible firmness cost tab trustworthy to us which matters. Perhaps which is since Ralph Waldo Emersonxxvii said. "A small firmness is better than any career."xxviii
To conclude, as great as with a voice which Allah s.w.t. has since behind to me, let me remind myself as great as th! ose who do not thoughts being reminded with a disproportion of Allah:
We have in truth combined male in a finest of molds,
Then We topsy-turvy him to a lowest of a low,
Except those who believed as great as did great works; for them there is a prerogative unending. - At-Tin (95): 4,5 as great as 6 (Maududi).
Hopefully, we will be between a exceptions.
Thank you.
NOTES
i Searchquotes.com
ii He was referring to Tun Hussain Onn
iii American systems theorists, architect, engineer, author, designer, contriver as great as futurist.(1895-1983)
iv Businessman, humanitarian as great as New Thought self-help book writer (1902-2002)
v Writer. (1940- ) Searchquotes.com
vi An Egyptian jurist, academician as great as reformer regarded as a owner of Islamic modernism. (1849-1905)
vii Teoh Beng Hock, a Political Aide to a DAP State Assemblyman. Date of situation 15.7.2009.
viii Source: Office of Chief Judge (Malaya)
ix From initial day of conference until a report was finished (printed). Source: Office of Chairman of Commission of Inquiry.
x Ahmad Sarbani Bin Mohamed. Date of situation 6.4.2011
xi Sourse: Ofice of Chief Judge (Malaya)
xii Y.B. Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim
xiii Source: Office of Chief Judge (Malaya)
xiv Utusan Ma! laysia O nline 10.1.2010
xv Utusan Malaysia Online 11.1.2012
xvi Dato Mohd Khir Bin Toyo
xvii Source: Office of Chief Judge (Malaya)
xviii Datuk Haji Harun Bin Haji Idris v. PP (1977) 2 MLJ 155 (FC)
xix Haji Abdul Ghani Bin Ishak & Anor. v. PP (1981) 2 MLJ 230 (FC)
xx PP v Dato Waad Bin Mansor (2005) 1 CLJ 421 (FC); (2003) 3 CLJ 833 (CA)
xxi Datuk Haji Zulkifli Bin Datuk Abdul Hamid v. PP (1981) 1 MLJ 112 (FC)
xxii Datuk Sahar Arpan v. PP (2007) 1 CLJ 326 (CA)
xxiii PP v. Dato Haji Mohamed Muslim ((1983) 1 MLJ 245 (HC) 14
xxiv Dato Mokhtar Hahim & Anor. v. PP (1983) CLJ (Rep) 101 (FC)
xxv Former President of Malaysian Chinese Association
xxvi Former Minister of Transport
xxvii American essayist, lecturer as great as poet. (1803-1882)
xxviii Searchquotes.com
Posted byart harun
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment