Needless to say, a former stormy a few Chinese feathers when RPK wrote:
I can see which most Chinese have been rebuilt to accept a slight crime as well as slight all else in a seductiveness of kicking out a Malay government. This sounds similar to this is not about eradicating crime though about kicking out a Malays. From where we am sitting this sounds similar to it is about Ketuanan Cina contra Ketuanan Melayu.
Yeah, sure, a Chinese have been unsentimental as well as realistic people, not similar to a Malays who have been emotional. The Chinese can accept slight crime as long as Umno is kicked out. Just have sure a money is in a red as well as not white envelope.
Do we know which an additional word for realism is hypocrisy?
Wakakaka. It's in a same vein as his outline in an earlier post of those elderly Chinese as 'prostitutes' who collected a white-pows from Ibrahim Ali.
Some indignant Chinese would disagree 'realism' is not 'hypocrisy' though 'pragmatism'.
In RPK's context, 'realism' equates to 'the tendency to view or represent things as they unequivocally are'.
'Hypocrisy', upon a alternative hand, equates to 'a disguise of carrying a just character, dignified or eremite beliefs or principles, etc., which a single does not unequivocally possess'.
Thus RPK has been improper in equating a dual words. However, my 'pragmatism' is most appropriate since it equates to 'action or policy commanded by consideration of a evident unsentimental consequences rsther than than by theo! ry or do gma'.
And we doubt even a! most in dignant Chinese Malaysians would disagree opposite my preference (of word) as Chinese minorities in SE Asia, either in Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines etc, have been well known to be 'pragmatic', principally as a claim for survival among a majority (and enviously resentful) natives.
But all a above have been small semantics, though we would contend Peter's idea of 'Ketuanan Cina contra Ketuanan Melayu' is approach over a top.
But as usual RPK is upon purpose provocative if not anything. He likes to tease, induce as well as of march incite to have a point. But what is his point?
IMHO, it's exactly a same as what blogger steadyaku47 has urged in his post ABU : we will attend to you. Will we attend to me?
Relevant extracts have been as follows:
Because we have endured so most abuses by this hurtful BN supervision most of we have come to a end which we contingency have shift during any costs. Change this bloody BN supervision initial since anything will be better afterwards a BN government. You have been all assured which once shift has been effected we will safeguard which whoever is in supervision will do as we wish them to do oversee this nation in a responsible as well as accountable manner. Let me remind we of a reality.
We elected this BN supervision into power. We allowed them to be in energy for 53 years. And it is only during this 13th ubiquitous choosing which we have been hoping to shift them? Change them with what?
Who amongst we can discuss it me which we can discuss it any Prime Minister of this nation how to oversee this country?
That is a reality. [...]
Do we assimilate which once these bastards have been in energy we have been of no stress t! o them u ntil a subsequent ubiquitous election? And prior to a su! bsequent ubiquitous choosing comes there will be sufficient time for them to do what they will to safeguard which they have their approach with us. And who will mount in their approach to stop them from doing this? Petra? Bersih? Steadyaku47? The Third Force? Mahasiswa? HUH! [...]
This is why we need to begin without any compromises since once we have been rebuilt to accept a less afterwards undiluted leader afterwards we have been revelation him which we will accept a less afterwards undiluted government. And where will which lead us to? [...]
I am not assured which we should accept second best to give ABU a better possibility to succeed. It will be an insult to a intelligence of those which await ABU to consider which they will accept flawed leaders since is which not a very reasons they wish UMNO out? we cannot agree which if we await ABU afterwards we contingency accept it warts as well as all.
Now what do we have to do to have ABU a reality? To begin with let us recognize a elephant which is in a room Anwar Ibrahim. we have put in my dual cents value upon this guy. we have worked for over dual years upon my blog in await of this guy....until, similar to so most others, we became an additional a single of those who now know him for what he unequivocally is! And we pronounced sufficient is enough. He is not fit to be a PM!
I do it not with a intentions of giving UMNO an advantage over what we wish to do.
Not with a intentions of weakening your resolve to have ABU a reality.
I do so with a intention of what we consider is a right thing to do. And which is to begin a ABU debate in a right manner, with a right leaders as well as for a right reasons. If what we do creates ABU falters afterwards let it falter for a right reason as well as which is to rid a ABU debate of anything which could after mistreat it.
As we review it, RPK's dual posts (mentioned during begin! ning) ar e fundament! ally pus hing during a same point, Chinese pomposity notwithstanding wakakaka.
So, for those who have been/are adamant about putting Anwar Ibrahim upon a hot seat in Putrajaya, with whatever it takes together with 'taking to a streets' as well as storming a Bastille, let me contend what RPK as well as steakyaku47 have said, (you might not comprehend it but) your intention is not reformasi though deformasi, a movement to benefit a single particular person rsther than than a rakyat.
In alternative words, ABU would afterwards be considered as a cultist movement rsther than than a single for democracy, freedom of countenance as well as human rights.
And as steadyaku47 warns, once someone not fit to be PM sits as one, it'll take years (maybe an additional 52) to dislodge him, since as sure as a sun rises in a East as well as sets in a West, ... and we refer to steadyaku47's difference again (note in particular 2nd sentence):
... once these bastards have been in energy we have been of no stress to them until a subsequent ubiquitous election? And prior to a subsequent ubiquitous choosing comes there will be sufficient time for them to do what they will to safeguard which they have their approach with us. And who will mount in their approach to stop them from doing this? Petra? Bersih? Steadyaku47? The Third Force? Mahasiswa? HUH! Read More @ Source
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment