Those of we around my age will recollect a Malays of a 1950s as good as 1960s. The Malays, then, were really different. Those born after a 1970s can go watch an aged P. Ramli black-and-white movie to see a Malays of a earlier era, a epoch prior to a Malays became Pseudo-Arabs. They partied. They drank. They gambled. The women wore skirts as good as sleeveless/bareback dresses. Now we get arrested if we do all that.
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
A crony of mine, Jad, a son of a really important Perak Mufti (not a benefaction a single who is infamous, not famous), told me this fun (which we have already created about before).
This man had four sons. The initial went upon to turn a doctor, a second an engineer, as good as a third a lawyer. The fourth son who was not so clever was sent to do eremite studies as good as he in a future became a Mufti
We roared with laughter although we admit this is substantially a bit unfair to a ex-Perlis Mufti who would not be within this category of apropos a Mufti as a 'job of a last resort'.
we recollect behind in a 1970s when most of my friends in Terengganu wanted their kids to turn teachers. Why teachers? Well, a operative hours have been short, we have prolonged holidays, a simple-mindedkampongfolks regard we highly as good as anything we contend is regarded as a Gospel, as good as we have a good possibility of fasten governing body as good as in a future apropos awakil rakyat.
Yes, 70% of thewakil rakyatof which epoch were teachers. One even became a Deputy Prime Minister with usually a customary six preparation as good as he would fun which whilst he did not have a PhD he did have dual BAs.
Actually, a Malay thoughts used to be real! ly simpl e. They were really happy apropos a clergyman orustaz(preacher). Then Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad came along in a 1980s as good as he 'poisoned' a minds of a Malays as good as told them to turn usually similar to a Chinese. (That was a crux of his book,The Malay Dilemma, which was primarily banned).
Yes, we was there in a Equatorial Hotel in a early days of a 1980s when Dr Mahathir initial became Prime Minister. And his war-cry was for a Malays to ape a Chinese, turn abounding similar to a Chinese, adopt Chinese 'work ethics', go in to partnership with a Chinese given a Chinese have a income as good as a networking which a Malays do not have, as good as so upon as good as so forth.
Dr Mahathir cajoled, goaded, provoked as good as pushed a Malays so which he could turn them in to 'Melayu Baru" ('New Malays'). And, today, 30 years later, what we see all over civic Malaysia have been a 'New Malays'.
To these New Malays, it is all about money. If a Chinese can do it afterwards we can additionally do it. If we can't do it afterwards we should block a Chinese from doing it. Better still, if we can't do it upon our own afterwards we should force a Chinese to share what they have with us -- at slightest 30% 'free shares' in a suggestion of a NEP.
Aiyah, Wanita MCA is screaming about a 'China Dolls' problem. They wish a supervision to do something about it because, according to them, their husbands have been bonking these China Dolls. Actually, as most Malays as Chinese have been bonking these China Dolls. The Malays do what a Chinese do.
Anyway, behind to Muftis,ustazandwakil rakyat. Now do we know given most times these people all speak crap? It is given of a peculiarity of these people. In a approach we can contend which they can never be successful doing something else so they go in to eremite studies, turn teachers, as good as stick upon politics.
When we speak to these e! remite t eachers or preachers it is regularly about sex. This cannot. That cannot. Thisharam. Thatharam.All we hear is about this as good as which which will lead to sex.
Why this obsession with sex? Well, have we beheld or not which most of these people 'follow a Prophet's example' (the forgive they regularly offer to clear some-more than a single wife), by having some-more than a single wife? Exactly! These eremite people have been hornier than a bitch in heat. That is given they have been so obsessed with sex. And which is given everything they see is associated with sex.
Valentine's Day will lead to sex. Parties will lead to sex. Concerts will lead to sex. Hey, there is some-more sex upon a Internet than anywhere else in Malaysia. Why not anathema a Internet as well?
Of course, a complaint of New Malays is some-more an civic than a farming problem. This is given a civic Malays wish to turn Brown Chinese. We call 'westernised' Chinese bananas (yellow upon a outward but white upon a inside). we do not know what to call these Brown Chinese. Maybe we can call them Pseudo-Chinese.
TheseMelayu Baruor Pseudo-Chinese have been not really nice creatures, we know. Many non-Malays lamentation which they favourite theMelayu Lama(Old Malays) better. In fact, when they travel to a farming areas or a Malay heartland, such as Terengganu as good as Kelantan, they can still see manyMelayu Lama. And they ask: given can't a civic Malays be usually similar to their farming brethren?
On a alternative side, whilst Dr Mahathir was perplexing to turn a Malays in to Chinese, Anwar Ibrahim, who assimilated Dr Mahathir soon after a latter became Prime Minister, pushed for some-more Islamisation. Now, 30 years later, we have a whole garland of Pseudo-Arabs running around Malaysia. This cannot. That cannot. Thisharam. Thatharam. Concerts cannot. Valentine's Day cannot. Santa Clause hats cannot. Skirts cannot. Hold han! ds canno t.
Those of we around my age will recollect a Malays of a 1950s as good as 1960s. The Malays, then, were really different. Those born after a 1970s can go watch an aged P. Ramli black-and-white movie to see a Malays of a earlier era, a epoch prior to a Malays became Pseudo-Arabs. They partied. They drank. They gambled. The women wore skirts as good as sleeveless/bareback dresses. Now we get arrested if we do all that.
Can we right away understand a problems we have been confronting in Malaysia? Half a Malays wish to turn Arabs as good as a alternative half wish to turn Chinese. No a single wants to be genuine Malays any longer. And those in their 60s similar to me will lamentation about a good aged days when Malays were Malays as good as not Pseudo-Arabs as good as Pseudo-Chinese.
And do we know what is most interesting about this whole thing? Both Dr Mahathir as good as Anwar have been not pristine Malays (neither am we so greatfully do not take which matter as an insult to Dr Mahathir or Anwar). And a single wants to turn a genuine Malays in to Arabs as good as a alternative in to Chinese.
So right away we have a single group of Malays who speak about this cannot, which cannot, this haram, which haram. Then a alternative group is materialistic, greedy, corrupt, inconsiderate, racist, as good as usually think about money, money, money, power, power, power.
Do we know which behind in a 1950s as good as 1960s it was so formidable to get someone to turn a celebration leader? Everyone would exclude to turn a personality as good as we had to go down upon your knees to desire him/her to take over a care of a party. Today, they murder, bribe, as good as badmouth to turn a leader.
If we could travel behind in time to a 1960s we would make certain which Icekik(strangle) both Dr Mahathir as good as Anwar. Then, today, Malaysia would still be similar to it used to be in a aged days. Hmmm.maybe not after all. If we do which afterwards ! Nurul Iz zah would not be around currently as good as which would be a great loss to Malaysia as we goal she will a single day emerge as a Opposition Leader as good as lead our republic in to a new epoch whenMelayu Lama,Melayu Baru, Cina, India, as good as what have you, no longer exists as good as we have been all usually Malaysians.
Yes, we need a younger era to do that. The aged era of Dr Mahathir as good as Anwar have screwed up a nation big time.
Oh, as good as prior to we start screaming as good as ask given am we usually right away whacking Dr Mahathir as good as Anwar, actually we have been whacking them for a little time now, given approach behind in a 1980s. And what we am saying here is merely a repetition of what we have already said most times before. However, in a past we did not hatred me similar to we do right away so we didn't review properly what we wrote. Hence, when we hatred me we have been some-more vicious of what we write as good as when we have been some-more vicious we take some-more notice of what we write.
The bottom line is: when we hatred me we review some-more delicately what we write so which we can find points to strike me.
Don't hold me? Well, let me put it an additional way. Ahmad Deedat, a great censor of Christianity, knew some-more about a Bible as good as could quote from mental recall passages of a Bible as good as discuss it we which version of a Bible it came from when even a Bishop of South Africa had to open a Bible to check. Anti-Islam Christians have review a Quran entirely as good as can discuss it we what a Quran says when even Muslim scholars themselves can't do that.
The bottom line is: Ahmad Deedat as good as these Christians review a Bible as good as Quran respectively given they wish to find fault as good as criticise it. The same applies for those of we who hatred me as good as review what we write given we wish to strike me.
Okay, after saying all that, let's see how we ! strike m e as good as counter what we said above.
Read More @ Source More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment