The protester and civil disobedience

What would life be if there is no gainsay as well as no a single takes up a causes of a minority, a marginalized or even a masses?

COMMENT

By David Tneh
Recent events such as Bersih 2.0, a Bar Council's march to criticism a Peaceful Assembly Bill (PAB) 2011, as well as a students demonstrating opposite a Universities as well as University Colleges Act (UUCA) amendment, have spawned a discuss upon either polite insubordination as well as a order of law ca! n co-exi st in a approved system such as ours.

A new write up by a comparison lawyer in an English daily opined which this discuss is unsuited during a heart as well as polite insubordination customarily constitutes a minority who impose their will upon a law abiding majority.

The bard additionally argued which a action of polite disobedience, if it goes unpunished, would lead to disharmony as well as commotion in society.

The action of polite insubordination itself is tantamount to a single violation a law; it is a rapist control "regardless of how novel is a motive of a polite disobedient."

And with a transparent anxiety to Malaysia, a action of polite disobedience, according to a writer, is only a domestic apparatus used by politicians as well as polite rights transformation to clear their violation of laws.

One however can argue which in a approved society, a single has no preference yet to follow a laws as well as regulations which govern a authorised society, after all, a duly inaugurated deputy or lawmaker has been since a mandate by a people to order laws for a great of multitude as well as country.

We have been therefore assuming, without a great of a ! doubt, w hich such lawmakers would know what is best for all of us.

Drawbacks of representational democracy
This is indeed very shocking since what is great for a sold statute supervision is not indispensably great for a people.

And if a sold law is upheld by a authority who is merely voting according to domestic celebration guidelines, afterwards there is a probability which certain laws could be upheld which would annoy as well as means injustices to a people who have been a foundation of any approved state.

This is a single of a drawbacks of representational democracy as a passing of certain laws have been infrequently not finished with a interests of a people in thoughts yet finished in a interest of consolidating a power of a domestic party.

If this is so, could a people afterwards uncover their gainsay or restlessness by polite disobedience?

One would many probably make use of a clichd resolution of display one's restlessness by a list box (elections) which incidentally happens every 5 years.

Would a single afterwards wait for once every 5 years just to uncover one's displeasure during what is function to multitude as well as country?

Could a action of polite insubordination itself, bolster as well as propagate a some-more approved republic to a powers-that-be?

The answer is a resounding "yes" since left have been a days when laws have been upheld as well as adults of a republic have no preference yet to obey such laws.

This is some-more so in a 20th as well as 21st century where rough regimes as well as dictatorial states which had used a military as well as military to clamp down upon governmental dissent, mostly finished with full of blood consequences.

Is polite insubordination a crime?
Would polite insubordination afterwards be construed as a rapist action opposite a hurtful as well as rough state even yet it is perceived to be a approved nation?

H istory of a struggle of mankind for leisure as well as truth (not indispensably for democracy) has shown which polite insubordination is a budding blossom which complements as well as strengthens a routine of approved governance, as well as a approved supervision has a avocation to attend to bona fide dissenting views as well as issues brought brazen by a people.

The pass word here is legitimate, as well as a single does not need a very justifiable as well as many well-developed reason to be involved in polite disobedience.

The Bukit Asahan Long Mar of 1967 as well as a Baling criticism of 1974 have been dual transparent examples civilians took part to quarrel for a rights of oppressed groups, to criticism again unfair laws, corruption, a poor, as well as opposite rough stakeholders.

Civil insubordination can never be practiced in a impassioned since it would afterwards be well known as a host or a riot.

The rioting in London early this year, for instance, is not a form of polite insubordination since rioters do not have a bona fide means in their action.

The host as well as rioters were a main means for a looting chaos, robberies, assaults upon a military force, a torching as well as blazing of cars as well as buildings in London.

Civil insubordination groups meanwhile, have been well organized, have a sold aim as well as have been customarily a bloc of polite rights movements, non-partisan groups, non-governmental organizations, as well as even domestic parties.

Over-zealousness as well as a hazard to make use of assault is never a part of polite insubordination groups or movements since they have been a bona fide group, voicing a bona fide cause, upon a bona fide issue.

To join forces with polite insubordination with a rioting in London or to contend which it would means anarchy, chaos, anarchy, tyranny, confusion, a toppling of governments, a drop of nation, society, would be an insult to any right meditative particular w! ith a co nscience.

Hence, since there have been only very couple of right meditative with such qualities as a above, they will regularly be a minority.

People have been listening
It is regularly a wordless majority who will ride upon a efforts of a tiny majority upon issues pertaining to a individual, society, country, a economy or a environment.

For this majority who many mostly determine in principle with polite insubordination issues, it is distant simpler to let this minority "fight it out" with a powers-that-be than to physically participate in criticism marches.

Perhaps, during a end of a day, a emanate is not really about polite disobedience, yet with "civil obedience."

The actuality which multitude responds with such acts of polite insubordination proves which a people have been listening as well as actively exercising their rights in a abounding democracy which allows spaces for negotiation.

The last thing you would ever want, in a democracy, have been pale as well as law-abiding adults who do no! t know w hy they have been abiding laws in a initial place, which of march leads to a trespass of power as well as a hegemony of a state over a individual.

Perhaps it is righteously for Time Magazine to honour "The Protestor" as person of a year for 2011.

What would life be if there is no gainsay as well as no a single to take up causes for a minority, a downtrodden, a marginalized or even for a masses?

David Tneh reads FMT as well as writes upon socio-economic issues.

Read More @ Source

20111101 Pemimpin MCA tipu pemimpin Malaysia Politics

Video Rating: 0 / 5

More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |

Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz