Malay nonconformist organisation Perkasa reminded currently which Article 153 helped keep the country peaceful as well as which it should not be questioned after the Christian leader pronounced it should be inclusive of all groups.The nonconformist organisation was responding to National Evangelical Christian Fellowship (NECF) authority Reverend Dr Eu Hong Seng who pronounced yesterday which the Federal Constitution's Article 153 is akin to "bullying" if it usually protects the rights of the single group.
Dr Eu statement was in truth accurate to the actuality which compartment currently the Article 153 has been widely as well as blatantly dissipated as well as used against the others in sequence to strengthen the personal interests as well as political energy of the sold political party, namely Umno. What Umno had always being observant is but Umno there will be no Malay as well as if Umno loses the Malays will stop to exist as well as so on.
Same goes to Perkasa, they dissipated Article 153 in sequence to promote the leverage of the single competition as well as the single sacrament over the other. Did Article 153 ever mention which Malay as well as Islam sequence over alternative races? The answer is clearly No to the actuality which it usually referred to the preservation of the Malays as well as the alternative locals because of their origins.
In fact, Umno as well as Perkasa have been both additionally blatantly misusing the Article 153 against the alternative bumiputras similar to the Dayaks, Ibans, Ka! dazans, Muruts as well as so on. To reaffirm Dr Eu's statement, you would repeat which Article 153 right away is akin of bullying not usually to the non-Malays but to the alternative bumip! utras as well.
The alternative actuality is Article 153 additionally proves to be contradicting with Article 8 (1), (2), (3); Article twelve as well as Article thirteen as well as you have been right away wondering how can these contradicting Articles be existing in the Federal Constitution side by side as well as there is no transparent understand upon how to conclude these Articles should any disputes arise, which Article is starting to overrule the alternative as well as the alternative indications with the effectiveness.
Furthermore, the Perkasa leader Syed Hasan Syed Ali additionally pronounced which the deadly competition riots happened in thirteen May 1969 because the Article 153 was not exercised properly. What does Syed Hasan means by Article 153 not exercised properly? It looks similar to Syed Hasan himself was unclear of what unequivocally had happened during which time or he is only simply denying it, the doctrinaire racist indeed.
Actually, in thirteen May 1969, the usually thing happened was the antithesis parties won the lot of seats in which year's general election. Umno, fearing which they might lose power, created the riots as well as afterwards declared an puncture sequence so which they could disqualify the results of the elections in sequence to forestall the antithesis parties from taking up their democratically elected roles in the council as well as state legislative assemblies.
The alternative thing was based upon Syed Hasan's statement upon the Article 153 was not exercised properly, by whom? Is Perkasa right away trying to pull the blame onto someone else? In the Article 153 it states which it is the responsibility of the Yang Dipertuan Agong to guarantee the special positions of the Malays as well as the alternative locals in this country.
In this case, is Perkasa blaming the Yang Dipertuan Agong for riots in thirteen May 1969? Syed Hasan pronounced "not exercis! ed prope rly" which defines the chairman obliged of safeguardin! g, which is the Yang Dipertuan Agong. Who else?
Therefore, Syed Hasan as well as his Perkasa cohorts' movement itself had already demonstrated their kind of bullying. Come on, be the man as well as do not hide behind the Article 153! You do not have back bones?
ByViktor Wong
More Barisan Nasional (BN) | Pakatan Rakyat (PR) | Sociopolitics Plus |
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment