22 Sep 2011
Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak in truth has a country buzzing with his promises of unconditional reforms, though any shift to these laws will take during slightest a year as good as that's practically an infinity in politics.
___________________________
THERE'S been so most excited waving during a past week over a Prime Minister's Malaysia Day debate which you infrequently feel like I'm living in a bowl of jelly. This is not a first time a PM has done a Malaysian open as giddy as schoolgirls during a Justin Bieber concert.
I am aged enough to recollect former budding apportion Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad's "Clean, Efficient, Trustworthy" guarantee upon receiving energy as good as how people suspicion which this was a commencement of a brand brand brand new type of government. One which was not "dirty, incompetent as good as dishonest". Of course, after a numerous monetary scandals involving billions, which goal went out a window.
Tun Abdullah Badawi's "work with me not for me" statement additionally captured a public's aptitude as good as his guarantee for greater polite liberties had hardcore opposition supporters voting BN for a first time. It didn't take too prolonged before tear gas as good as containing alkali H2O cannons washed away a feeling of well-being which greeted a brand brand brand new PM.
Now it is Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak's turn, as good as in truth he has got a country buzzing with his promises of unconditional reforms.
The Internal Security Act (ISA) is to be abolished, as good as a Printing Presses as good as Publications Act (PPPA) nice along with a slew of other changes.
I do not believe which you am being overly cynical when you contend "this is all good as good as good though I'll believe it when you see it".
My concern is two-fold. First, unless as good as until you essentially see a figure which a nice PPPA takes, as good as until you can closely scrutinise a dual brand brand brand new laws whi! ch have been ostensible to be a replacement for a ISA, you consider it is premature to consider which you have been finally rid of these draconian laws.
From my unde! rstandin g, underneath a due nice PPPA, a newspaper can still have a licence taken away by a Government. Is this routine starting to be easy for a Government as good as but any recourse to a courts for a paper? If so, afterwards there's not most change, is there?
The same goes with a dual brand brand brand new security laws which have been ostensible to replace a ISA. If there is still extended option to catch but trial afterwards all you have is aged wine in a brand brand brand new bottle. you am unconvinced, for example, which a brand brand brand new laws will usually be used for terrorism cases.
If a brand brand brand new law is usually for terrorists, who is starting to conclude who is a militant as good as who is not? And but a trial, a detention sequence can still be easily abused all a single needs to do is credit a chairman of being a apprehension threat.
My second concern has to do with a sustainability of a idea inside of Umno. Let's not forget, a complement of supervision you have in Malaysia follows a Westminster model, which is to contend you don't opinion for our PM directly.
The PM is fundamentally a choice of a celebration with a majority in Parliament, as opposed to a presidential complement where a personality of a republic is selected directly by a people.
If this idea to abolish a ISA as good as to make these unconditional systemic changes is primarily from a Prime Minister, how can you be certain which his celebration will follow by with it if he is no longer PM?
Any shift to these laws will take during slightest a year. A week is a prolonged time in politics, a year is practically an infinity as good as anything can occur in such a period.
Putting my concerns aside, you goal which something certain will come from these promises as good as which these laws will be changed, as good as a changes will be! estimab le as good as meaningful. If it does happen, let us not dont think about which they happened since a people wanted it to happen.
No matter what a ruling celebration claims, if it wasn't for a startle which they had in March 2008, if it wasn't for a consistent call for a dissolution of these laws from a open as good as polite society! , you wou ldn't all be waving as you have been now. Read More @ Source
Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz
No comments:
Post a Comment