No evidence Male Y DNA came from sperm cells, sodomy trial told

By Shazwan Mustafa Kamal

September 19, 2011

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept nineteen An Australian DNA consultant pronounced currently there is no justification to uncover that DNA profiles performed from "Male Y" in Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's sodomy trial came from spermatazoa cells.

Dr Brian McDonald, a counterclaim declare in a high-profile trial, went so far to suggest that a prosecution had no proof whatsoever to a type of cells a DNA profiles were taken from.

He additionally challenged laboratory commentary finished by supervision chemists Dr Seah Lay Hong as well as Dr Nor Aidora Saedon, as well as forked out a probability of contamination to a samples taken as well as tested by chemists, that he claimed had been abandoned by them.

"There is no justification presented that allows a prosecution to draw that conclusion," pronounced Dr McDonald when asked by counterclaim lawyer Ramkarpal Singh either a prosecution had proven that DNA profiles taken from Male Y came from spermatazoa cells.

"We do not not know what dungeon of sorts a samples were taken from," he said.

Dr McDonald had previously pronounced a DNA profiles in three spermatazoa samples taken from a complainant Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan's rectum showed "no justification of degradation".

Dr McDonald pronounced a tests finished by a supervision chemists had unsuccessful to uncover where a DNA samples were taken from. File pic

He had told a High Court that a DNA form in one high rectal sample was pre-dominantly from "Male Y", another was pre-dominantly Saiful's, as well as a third from a low rectal area was inconclusive.

Dr Nor Aidora testified last February that a "Male Y" DNA form matched those found ! upon a " Good Morning" towel since to Anwar during his overnight detention in a lock-up three years ago, when he was arrested for allegedly sodomising Saiful.

The focus currently was upon a B9 cotton swab from a high rectal area retrieved from Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan's rectum as well as a white towel retrieved from Anwar's dungeon when he was detained overnight.

Dr McDonald additionally pronounced that Dr Seah as well as Dr Nor Aidora had abandoned commentary that suggested a participation of a third DNA sample.

"They should have conducted further tests to make louder a commentary upon a 18 allele. Both of them (Seah as well as Nor Aidora) did not offer any reason as to why further tests were not done."

The foreign consultant pronounced a tests finished by a supervision chemists had unsuccessful to uncover where a DNA samples were taken from.

"That justification does not tell us (whether) it came from spermatazoa or saliva," pronounced Dr McDonald.

MORE TO COME

Malaysians Must Know a TRUTH

Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz