TITHES SCANDAL IN SABAH?

By : HAJI AMDE SIDIK

IT IS INTERESTING matter done by a former Chairman of Sabah Tithe Centre (PZS) Datuk Syed Abas Syed Ali with regards to involvement of community leaders, together with elected deputy in a placement of tithes to a target groups (DE 23/08/2011)

Ive in actuality been waiting for a response from MUIS with regard to this topic. My earlier query antiquated sometime upon 19/02 this year has not been responded. Among my queries were, we wanted to know where as well as how was a item of MUIS RM400 million twenty years ago?

How is Baitul Mal functioning, a not inside of a ambit of MUIS? How does a constitution of MUIS concede it to be functionally separated?

It is tall time for us Muslim in Sabah to see if a supposed transparency of activities of public institutions such as Baitul Mal as well as MUIS is at work as well as is exercised by a administrators as well as managers alike.

Public has right to see for e.g. pick up of tithes over a years, how a collections were organized, how placement have been made, or even what have been a criteria of a recipients- a so called waif as well as a needy alike.

How as well as what were feat so far, or whats a success index if you alike? we was sensitive even promises done by a MUIS personals with regards to facilities for those newly modify to Islam (Mualaf) have not been fulfilled in many districts.

My thought of bringing this to a surface so that everybody can learn what democracy is all about, Islam propelled based upon transparency as well as a part of a post of office building certitude between a Ummah! .

Come back! to a emanate of YBs have right in a placement of tithes to a target group, we think we need more construction from Datuk Syed.

In actuality upon a question of right, every Muslim has right not only a YB, as well as to supplement to this, it isnt only for UMNO YBs. we would still think a improved to leave it to God to decide who gets what as well as how much in a day after.

- Sabahkini

Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: