August 27, 2011
http://www.malaysia-chronicle.com
The Najib-Mahathir Conundrum as well as Malotts Bombshell
Written by Maclean Patrick, Wong Choon Mei, Malaysia Chronicle
Friday, 26 Aug 2011 11:00
Anwar Ibrahims new matter in invulnerability of himself is indeed a damning complaint to his foes. It suggested a apparent flaws inside of a prosecutions box against him as well as additionally a inequitable inlet of a courts themselves in a handling of a high-profile Sodomy II case.
Above all, it puts upon record a long-held suspicion of how dirty governing body is in Malaysias ruling UMNO party, to a border which white can be incited to black as well as vice-versa but conscience or apply oneself for a truth, probity as well as a adults wishes.
The Malaysian Opposition Leaders matter from a wharf mirrors a a single Nelson Mandela 
made in a famous Rivonia uncover hearing of 1963 under a afterwards South African apartheid regime. The position taken by Anwar as well as Mandela prior to him in creation an matter from a wharf is a direct criticism against a disaster of a probity of law in ensuring a suspect would be given a fair trial. It affords insurance to a accused especially those concerned in a politically encouraged hearing such as Sodomy II.
Anwar knew full well which a matter from a wharf would lift less weight as distant as a judge is concerned, compared! to a si ngle made under oath in a acknowledgement s! tand. Th e charge cannot subject his words as it is not a sworn statement, which it would be if it came from a acknowledgement box. It authorised Anwar Ibrahim to definitely state a events which led to him being arrested as well as charged for Sodomy II, but a inserted questioning by a charge team.
The shutting matter by Anwar Ibrahim is telling, This complete process is zero but a swindling by Prime Minister Dato Seri Najib Razak to send me in to domestic oblivion by attempting once again to put me during a back of bars. I, therefore, acknowledgement which we have no self-assurance whatsoever which probity will prevail in these proceedings in spite of a valiant efforts made by my defence team. As we have pronounced during a outset, this is not a rapist trial. It is a sham staged by a powers which be to put me out of action in order which they sojourn in power.
The Najib-Mahathir Conundrum as well as Malotts Bombshell
The upon top of end by Anwar Ibrahim foreshadows a matter by former American ambassador to Malaysia John Malott, who upon celebration of a mass Anwars comments decided to speak up. In his article to Malaysia Chronicle, he decided to dump a bombshell:
In 1998 Rohana joined me for a in isolation one-on-one luncheon during a Ambassadors residence. It was during a time when Anwar was starting to plea Mahathir, subtly but still obviously. Rohana told me which Najib as well as Anwar had reached a tip agreement. When Mahathir was gone, Anwar would be PM as well as Najib would be Deputy PM. That was a deal. That never happened, of course. When a going got tough, Najib stood by, as well a! s let An war go to jail. Rohana Mahmood was as well as still is a single Najibs most trusted advise! rs.
< p>So, was there a tip agreement in between Anwar Ibrahim as well as Najib Razak in 1998? That Najib would
be Deputy Prime Minister in a event Anwar was Prime Minister after their Wawasan 2020 group successfully challenged afterwards prime minister Mahathir Mohamad for a UMNO presidency? And afterwards what happened later? Did Najib form a new agreement with Mahathir, to Anwar as well as a nations great cost?This nugget of information from Malott may prove to be a smoking gun which points to a motives during a back of Sodomy II a sum obliteration of Anwar Ibrahim from a Malaysian domestic landscape, in sold from UMNO politics, by Najib. It is a clear bid to remove a domestic rival, in order to safeguard his own survival.
It would additionally explain Najibs passion in saying a end of Anwar Ibrahim when a pressure was seemingly loose during a tenure of Abdullah Badawi when Anwars self-assurance for sodomy was topsy-turvy in 2004. Yet only 3 months after a Oppositions thumping success in 2008, Anwar was arrested again for sodomy by a Najib administration.
Two questions as well as why not an RCI
Najib cannot excuse away his direct involvement in a case, given a complainant Saiful Bukhari Azlan paid a revisit to him as well as wife Rosmah Mansor just dual days prior to lodging a police report. This brings in to context a personal inlet of a box brought against Anwar.
Saiful had no motive whatsoever to encounter Najib prior to creation a decision to lodge a police report. Yet, Najib as well as Rosmah agreed to enco! unter hi m as well as this brings in to question, what is a border of Najibs change upon Saiful as well as who else did Najib bring in as advisors to a case? Were former Inspector General of ! Police M usa Hassan as well as ex-Malacca CPO Rodhwan Ismail involved?
Obviously, a stream incident harks back to what Malott suggested in his article to Malaysia Chronicle. Immediately, dual questions spring out. Firstly, will a discuss of a tip agreement be put to Najib Razak when he takes to a acknowledgement box in Sodomy II? Secondly, will Anwars lawyers pull for a fresh Royal Commission of Inquiry in to a Mahathir-Najib conundrum in both sodomy cases or during a really slightest determine if there was indeed high-level government swindling against Anwar Ibrahim, which price him as well as his family 6 years jail-time as well as a nation implausible damage to a image.
Along with a obvious, which Sodomy II is a uncover hearing involving Saiful, Najib, Rosmah as well as most others in a stream establishment, Malaysians would want to know distant gone is a BN government in fixing-up situations as well as domestic rivals so as to achieve a result they instruct rather than what the Rakyat (populace) wants.
Indeed, Najib has a lot to answer for upon a day he takes a mount in a sodomy trial. But then, if guilty, he would have brought it onto himself.
No comments:
Post a Comment