Chinatown vs MRT: Where is Kong Cho Ha hiding his face?

Chinatown vs MRT: Where is Kong Cho Ha hiding his face?

LETTER Who is MCA perplexing to kid in the argumentative merger of Petaling Chinatown Street land for the building the whole of the Klang Valley Mass Rapid Transit (KVMRT)?

The scandal-tainted president Dr Chua Soi Lek had upon Wednesday (Aug 24, 2011) proudly voiced as well as promised which the 31 landowners upon Kuala Lumpurs Jalan Sultan would be able to hold upon to their property after the government agreed to reinforce their buildings as well as lapse upon execution of the tunnelling beneath their shops.

In reduction than twenty-four hours, Land Public Transport Commission (SPAD) authority Syed Hamid Albar pronounced the mandatory merger of the Jalan Sultan lots where the KVMRT would run underground was necessary since under land law, landowners additionally owned the land which lies next ground.

We have to do mandatory merger of the land. It means which subsequently, they have to alienate the land above, Syed Hamid told reporters after the memorandum of understanding signing with Puspakom Sdn Bhd upon Thursday.

Syed Hamid combined which although they were currently operative upon the solution to concede the traders to lapse to Chinatown there is no guarantee which it would in the future be returned to the owners.

This again, as in the past, shows what MCA leaders say have been meaningless as well as only the damage carry out practice at your convenience argumentative issues afflicting the Chinese village arise.

In particular, can any one unequivocally trust Dr Chua to represent us?

Where is Kong hiding his face

In traffic with such iss! ues give n Merdeka, the MCA continues to dish out crap, never adhering the neck out for the! Chinese community.

The biggest joke in this Chinatown emanate is this: Why is the Transport Minister Kong Cho Ha gripping mum? Isnt he from MCA? Is the SPAD authority some-more powerful than Kong?

Of march the Umno SPAD authority is some-more powerful. Kong is gripping mum since his ministerial in front of (Kong is creation it invalid with his inaction) is some-more critical than the Chinese community.

If he objects, he will be removed by Umno, only similar to what happened to former MCA president Ong Tee Keat who foolishly knocked his conduct upon the brickwall in the multi-billion-ringgit Port Klang Free Zone (PKF) financial scandal.

Kong, after taking office, displayed his 101% faithfulness to the powers which be by rught away sweeping the PKFZ examine under the carpet, thus comnsolidating his ministerial position.

Under such circumstances, do we unequivocally expect the Kong or the MCA to defend the interests of the Chinese village or care the damn for the Chinese heritage zone?

Toothless

It is unequivocally abominable to note that, of late, the non-Umno ministers have been marked down to only puppets, toothless leaders who have been completely debasing to Umno as well as the powers which be.

Non-Umno ministers have been only puppets as well as unable to Umno-formed as well as Umno-linked commissions, committees, boards, etc.

So Malaysians, isnt it crystal clear which it does not unequivocally make any disproportion either there have been MCA, Gerakan or MIC ministers after the next ubiquitous election?

As for the Malays, only the cronies of Umno Malays will go on to pullulate whilst the infancy of Malays will go on to struggle in poverty.

- Lee Kee is the reader of Malaysia Chronicle


Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz ! & Bu zz

No comments: