Charity From the Head or Heart?

The domestic rivalry in between a statute federal supervision as good as a little Pakatan managed states is becoming some-more ludicrous as good as even regulating those upon gratification as pawns in this energy play game.

Each trying to lay explain a celebration has brought some-more investments, jobs, built some-more homes, took better caring of a bumis or mamaks in Penang, roughly all in BolehLand's ordinary folks hold up as good as living is being used for comparison.

Even God as good as sacrament have been being used as competition, - under me we built some-more mosques, temples, churches, funeral sites, freedom of sacrament as good as what not.

The latest is charity! Charity which is ostensible to be a heart thing is right away being made in to a conduct emanate - being headstrong upon one's gift which we gave as good as did some-more for a poor, underprivileged, aged, physically challenged - in short gratification work than we did - creates one's sincere free work a mockery! You do it to pick up brownie points for your domestic presence as good as additionally some-more expected please God to earn a place in sky doesn't quite reflect one's genuine sincerity as good as adore for one's hermit or sister.

Are we so desperate to have make have make use of of of of a free action to uncover which we have been some-more charitable, holier as good as what not than an additional person's action of gift or free efforts?

What have been we to have of a BN government's new explain 'It's BN govt which funds all gratification cases', with a Senator allocated Minister proclaiming which "30% of a RM1.2 billion spent by a supervision upon gratification final year was distributed to opposition-ruled states?"... NST August 21, 2011 pg 25.

Which brings to a subject if we have been a supervision as good as we consider we have been doing gratification as good as gift only to win votes, doesn't it have your supervision very feigned as good as not a obliged one?

And if we ! have mak e have make use of of of of alternative people's money, taxpayers which is, to do charity, does it meant we deserve all a regard as good as excellence for undertaking free work?

Each of us has experienced when it comes to gift work, a income collection or a! sk corpo rations for sponsorship as good as have make have make use of of of of alternative people's donation to lift out a free work. And a giver assumes every sen is used for a role as good as not a portion given to a group undertaking a initiative, an additional for a grand makan makan as good as launch gimmick as good as a leftover to a intended recipients!

If we have make have make use of of of of alternative people's income as good as afterwards put it in your company's inform we did a great CSR beginning isn't it rather devious, mischievous as good as uncharitable?

Of march a little might argue, if we do not ask for donation, we won't be equates to to assistance ordinary folks who genuinely wish to do gift though do not know how or can't have an stroke as an individual, to be equates to to do something for humanity. So we send out mass appeal letters or occupy veteran income collecting agents (who take a cut from what they pick up for you) or stand during malls to solicit for donations.

Yes, concluded which NGOs as good as those concerned with charities do not have a monetary equates to as good as depend upon contributions to lift out their work. That is since they have been called charities right?

But for a supervision to have make have make use of of of of politics to uncover they do gift is being feigned since a supervision is ostensible to additionally be socially responsible. Isn't which what a supervision is ostensible to do as good as ordinary folks as good as voters design them to do when they pick up taxes as good as have a equates to to undertake gratification programmes?

So what credit should we give to BN for their gratification programmes? Doesn't such boast 'I do some-more than you' a p! ointed i dentical to 'You assistance me we assistance you' identical to being imposed upon voters as good as additionally a gratification recipients?

So a series diversion is out upon charities. We can afterwards design adults to compare if Uncle Lim's monthly stipend, review taxpayers' monies, to senior adult in Penang get him some-more votes over a Madam Minister's gratification review taxpayers' monies. Which equates to BN certainly win upon this income used game. Never mind if a Federal Government has some-more taxpayer's pool during their disposal than Uncle Lim's State coffers.
With s uch billion ringgit eye opener BN income spent upon welfare, will it meant a large voters swing to BN in GE13 since BN have make have make use of of of of some-more income for gift work than a Pakatan fellos huh?

When Penang decided to give senior adults a little allowance, they were chided as good as turned in to a domestic issue.

When BN does gratification programme, give millions to Felda, millions of zakat to a poor, millions of duit raya or alternative ang pows for this as good as that, have been they telling us which such donations have been genuine as good as sincere as good as there is no domestic agenda behind them? While identical donations by Pakatan governments have been politically motivated as good as all a uncover off?

Most religions even if in BolehLand alternative religions have been considered non-believer as good as infidel worship, ask those who do gift which it should come from a heart. And God is a decider of one's action.

These days in BolehLand, gift from a head, rationalising a action as good as trying to explain since a single is doing it, is all intellectual posturing with a domestic distant motive.

Can we be humble as good as give as good as do acts of gift from a heart, than being so conduct strong which a action is some-more sincere as good as free over another?

Please avoid regulating recipients as pawns in a domestic game. If we wish to give th! em grace do not have them feel we have been doing it so we can stay in power, huh?

And if we have make have make use of of of of income people have donated whether taxes or in to your collection tin, isn't it obligatory upon we to ensure a income is to lift a dignity, socio economic as good as good being of a recipients? And not meant for a little self portion ground or have we feel shioksendiri or lift your domestic presence awaiting huh?
YAHMEH!!!

Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz

No comments: