The theme of myAsylums most new poll: your thoughts upon a result of a Teoh Beng Hock Royal Commission of Inquiry. The poll closed during midnight this past Friday, as good as a formula have been tabulated.
Quite overwhelmingly, a respondents were dissatisfied with a result of a inquiry. Looking during restlessness in general, 92% felt dissatisfied to some degree, with a very large shred (81%) expressing total dissatisfaction. Only about 8% of respondents where confident to some degree, with only a single respondent expressing finish satisfaction.
The tangible formula had 60 respondents choose a single of a four responses. Two respondents, comparison Other as good as providing a following responses:
- bull shit RCI it doesnt take a rocket scientist to investigate which this pretty most meant 100% Not Satisfied.
- its open ended. anyone to be charged? Walski made a preference to regard this as Somewhat Not Satisfied.
Granted which this was a elementary straw poll, though it does reflect what Walski has read online which a RCI brings us nowhere nearby to bringing a sad tale of Teoh Beng Hock ! to closu re.
(no closure, as good as not most remorse, in a full post)
Walski is not sure if we have read a full Royal Commissions report, which he had put up in a posting announcing a poll last week. Personally, Walski was somewhat satisfied, BUT only in as distant as a elect laying burden upon a officers involved with a TBH interrogation. He was NOT confident with a finding which TBH committed suicide.
Its a single thing which a layperson like Walski thinks so, though quite an additional when a identical perspective was voiced by someone some-more knowledgeable in a area of law.
A reputable former senior decider has branded a 3 judges upon a Teoh Beng Hock royal elect of exploration (RCI) 3 blind mice for final which a political aide committed suicide despite lacking consultant opinion. Former High Court as good as Court of Appeal decider Datuk N. H. Chan said a elect had no commercial operation forming such an perspective as nothing of a experts it called upon gave a perspective which Teoh committed suicide.
He forked out which this went opposite Section 45 of a Evidence Act 1950, which states which when a justice has form an perspective upon a point of science, a opinions of experts have been applicable facts.
Without any applicable fact, which is to say, without an perspective from an expert, a justice is incompetent to form an perspective upon... a systematic point which Teoh Beng Hock took his own life. In this case, nothing of a experts gave a perspective which Teoh took his own life, Chan said in an essay sent to The Malaysian Insider.
(source: The Malaysian Insider)
Pretty strong words! , if we were to ask Walski. The former decider formed hi! s opinio n upon impending legal requirements. If we recall, an progressing Coroners Inquiry in to a case concluded which Teoh Beng Hock died from neither homicide, nor suicide.
Understandably, a end which a RCI has arrived during was not something a family of a late Teoh could accept either, as good as they have been right away considering either or not to aspire to a judicial review of a RCIs end as good as report.
Prime Minister Najib has urged Malaysians to not brawl a RCI inform upon Teoh (via Free Malaysia Today), stating which the commentary were formed upon truth. Perhaps it would be a good thing for a PM to cruise which another Royal Commissions commentary as good as recommendations were once upon a time disputed.
Walski reckons which it all depends upon who a encountering celebration is, huh?
On a apart note, a MACC has responded by suspending a 3 officers declared in a RCI report. But many Malaysians have been substantially asking: And afterwards what?
In a meantime, as all of us have been aware, an additional MACC interrogation resulted in an almost identical tragedy, ironically while a RCI was in session. So far, what a MACC has had to contend is which they it study a report. Oh, as good as which a cessation of a 3 officers will not repairs a morale of a commission.
Not exactly a show of remorse, if we ask Walski. Nor has there been any apology from a Malaysian government. But afterwards again, thats Malaysia for we the substantially simpler to fist H2O out of a rock than it is for someone to contend theyre sorry.
What happens next? Reckon which good just have to wait for as good as see. Hopefully, something ! really < /em>positive comes out of this latest RCI. But formed upon a lane record of new RCIs, Walski isnt about to hold his b! reath an y time soon.
No comments:
Post a Comment