The RCI has done a end which TBH committed self-murder as a result of assertive as well as enlarged doubt by MACC officers.
No a single except a person/persons responsible for his genocide would know what had actually transpired before as well as during a time of his death.
Logic would discuss it us which a person who was usually a declare as well as who was ostensible to married a subsequent day, as well as who was going to be a father soon, would not take his own hold up easily.
He was possibly pushed out of a window or he jumped himself.. The former would have his genocide a murder, as well as a latter would be suicide.
RCI ruled which he committed self-murder underneath compulsion from MACC officers. If this is a case, afterwards a few questions came to my mind.
1. Did not a MACC know which he was usually a witness?
2. If so, why was a tactic of assertive as well as enlarged doubt used upon TBH?
3. From 1 as well as 2, you can ascertain which a MACC officers concerned had sure intention to have TBH turn against his boss. The intention could be due to possibly of a following:
a. a officers genuinely believed which TBHs boss was guilty of corruption; or
b. they know which THBs Boss is not guilty though they still wish to have a box out of it to please someone.
4. deducing from RCIs conclusion, this intention to break TBH competence have done Teoh to feel so miserable (under such inhuman duress, anything could be possible) which he jumped as well as killed himself to escape from a duress. That is what a RCI is saying.
Perhaps, a officers concerned knew which underneath such duress, a declare could dedicate suicide. If they knew this as well as still went forward with a assertive as well as enlarged questioning, afterwards this becomes a transparent box of homicide, even if TBH had jumped himself . This is not distinct a incident where a pirate with a blade is forcing a plant to burst from a cliff. Yes, a plant jumps himself, though he! has no alternative choice when faced with someone indicating a blade during him.. In TBHs case, a compulsion he is placed underneath is eq! uivalent to a knife.
I am not a counsel though i am usually regulating usual sense as well as talking from a moral angle regulating RCIs conclusion..
The officers responsible contingency be charged for this is a iniquitous crime. A iniquitous crime which arises from a abuse of energy in an group which is ostensible to be a protector of a system..
Even a highers-up such as a executive as well as so upon contingency take responsibility as well as resign, as a uncover of accountability.
Otherwise, who will ever feel safe to turn a witness, if to be a declare equates to hours of inhuman treatment? Who would wish to be in a incident where a blade is figuratively indicating during you?
If this can occur to witnesses, I unequivocally empathize those who have been indicted of crimes
Malaysia contingency stop all these madness,abuses as well as rots in a system
(The argument here is formed upon a end done by a RCI, as well as this does not mean which a author agrees with a findings of a RCI..)
No comments:
Post a Comment