Call for class action against Police Act

Lawyer Leong Cheok Keng says it is unconstitutional to deny permits for open rallies.

IPOH: A tellurian rights counsel has called for a class-action fit to challenge a inherent validity of Section twenty-seven of a Police Act, which sets conditions for a granting of permits for open rallies.Section twenty-seven of a Police Act has to be challenged in justice as it contradicts Articles 4(1)(a) and (b) of a Constitution, pronounced Leong Cheok Keng, who gained inflection dual years ago as counsel for former Perak menteri besar Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin in his fit opposite Barisan Nasionals takeover of a state government.

Article 4(1)(a) of a Federal Constitution provides for freedom of debate and expression and Article 4(1)(b) gives adults a right to pacific assembly.

Under Section twenty-seven of a Police Act, a organisation intending to reason a open convene contingency request for a assent 90 days prior to a event and a district military arch give his decision within 3 days.

If a application is rejected, an appeal to a arch military officer (CPO) of a state contingency be filed within 48 hours. The CPOs decision is final. It cannot be challenged in court.

Leong contends which Section twenty-seven is unconstitutional.

The military contingency remember which a Federal Constitution reigns supreme over a Police Act, he said.

He also criticised a military force for what he pronounced was a disposition opposite opposition parties in a coercion of a law.

Speaking to FMT, he called upon a government to apply oneself a inherent rights of all adults and issue correct guidelines to a military upon a coercion of Section 27.

Another tellurian rights lawyer, Augustine Anthony, called upon a government to dissolution a Emergency Ordinance of! 1969, a s endorsed by a Royal Police Commission! in 2005 .

The ordinance was enacted to fight aroused acts of subversion. Anthony remarkable which military had resorted to regulating it opposite opposition parties instead of a scandalous Internal Security Act (ISA).

He believes a government fears which regulating a ISA will capture universe attention. The ordinance, similar to a ISA, enables a military to reason suspects for 60 days and magnify a duration of apprehension but hearing to dual years by order of a Home Minister.

Courtesy of Bonology.com Politically Incorrect Buzz & Buzz